Every category where a model named Spreadsheets for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Fixed asset accounting	Accounting and close	0%	94 of 94	100%	4	under 10 labels · led by Sage Fixed Assets at 29%
Lease accounting	Accounting and close	0%	59 of 60	100%	4	under 10 labels · led by FinQuery at 36%
Cap table management	Equity and corporate	0%	41 of 41	100%	3	under 10 labels · led by Carta at 44%
Cash flow forecasting	Treasury and cash	0%	84 of 86	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 18%
Corporate tax provision	Tax and compliance	0%	97 of 98	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision at 26%
Internal controls and SOX	Tax and compliance	0%	71 of 71	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by AuditBoard at 18%
Account reconciliation	Accounting and close	0%	57 of 72	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33%
Entity management	Equity and corporate	0%	84 of 87	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Athennian at 18%
Revenue recognition	Accounting and close	0%	73 of 77	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Spreadsheets yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Spreadsheets across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	6	6
Mistral Small	0	3	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	2	3
Kimi K2	0	2	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative39 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative44 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Spreadsheets / Excel: sources warn they create data integrity, version-control, security, and compliance risks, and they are poor for large or complex lease portfolios.” Perplexity Sonar · Lease accounting · negative prompt · hard negative

“Spreadsheets lack built-in audit controls, version history, and data validation, making them prone to errors, missed payments, and compliance issues.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Lease accounting · negative prompt · hard negative

“Most experts strongly advise against using spreadsheets for lease accounting, especially for organizations with more than 10 leases.” Mistral Small · Lease accounting · negative prompt · hard negative

“spreadsheets are a common tool to avoid, as they can contain errors and are prone to problems such as miscalculations” Llama 4 Maverick · Fixed asset accounting · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Spreadsheets, over the 44 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Spreadsheets was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

QuickBooks Online5 of 441Not in the top three

Maxio5 of 440Not in the top three

NetSuite Advanced Revenue Management5 of 440Not in the top three

Carta4 of 441Not in the top three

Pulley4 of 441Not in the top three

Chargebee RevRec4 of 440Not in the top three

Oracle4 of 440Not in the top three

Sovos Tax Provision4 of 440Not in the top three

Zuora Revenue4 of 440Not in the top three

Finlens3 of 441Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Spreadsheets. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 42 of the 44 answers that named Spreadsheets and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org20

g2.com10

guideflow.com10

linkedin.com8

rightrev.com8

capterra.com7

financialexecutives.org7

mrisoftware.com7

reddit.com7

chargebee.com6

Ninety of the ninety domain citations in answers naming Spreadsheets came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

chargebee.com/blog/avoid-the-revenue-recognition-pitfalls5

financialexecutives.org/FEI-Daily/April-2019/Tax-Provisioning-and-Spreadsheet-Risk.aspx5

rightrev.com/enterprise-revenue-recognition-challenges5

rightrev.com/top-revenue-recognition-software-2026-a-comprehensive-buyers-guide5

zenskar.com/buyers-guide/revenue-recognition-software5

assetcues.com/blog/fixed-asset-tracking-software4

cbh.com/insights/articles/tax-provision-automation-guide-benefits-software-roadmap4

costarmanager.com/blog/why-lease-accounting-software-systems-fail4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Spreadsheets

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Spreadsheets; a claim can dispute any of them.

Spreadsheets (e.g., Excel) 4Spreadsheets (Excel, Google Sheets) 2Spreadsheets (Excel/Google Sheets) 2spreadsheets 2Excel and Spreadsheets 1Spreadsheets (Excel / Google Sheets) 1Spreadsheets (Excel) 1Spreadsheets (especially Excel) 1Spreadsheets and Excel 1spreadsheets/Excel 1spreadsheets/Google Sheets 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Spreadsheets's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Spreadsheets, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at spreadsheets.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.