Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Syft Analytics · September 2026 Edition

Syft · 4 categories · Named, not ranked

Syft Analytics

32Judge labels

2First choices

2Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

4Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Syft Analytics was named 8 times in Financial reporting and 3 other categories, where Sage Intacct led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business15 of 108

under the label threshold

Mid-market16 of 133

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In financial reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Syft Analytics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Financial reporting and dashboards	Planning and analysis	2%	16 of 133	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27%
Financial consolidation	Accounting and close	0%	29 of 96	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 19%
AI accounting assistants	Accounting and close	0%	45 of 79	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 25%
Cash flow forecasting	Treasury and cash	0%	78 of 86	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Syft Analytics yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Syft Analytics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	1	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase6 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labels2

Scale-constrained9 labelsNone

Negative1 label1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Syft Analytics if you already use Xero or QuickBooks and want to generate professional, visual financial reports” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial reporting · budget prompt · first choice

“Best for Analytics and Dashboards: Syft Analytics ... a highly robust option” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“less focused on daily bank-level cash reconciliation than dedicated tools” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cash flow forecasting · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Syft Analytics, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Syft Analytics was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Fathom26 of 322Not in the top three

LiveFlow14 of 324Not in the top three

Joiin9 of 324Not in the top three

Xero8 of 320Not in the top three

OneStream7 of 321Not in the top three

QuickBooks Online6 of 323Not in the top three

Jirav6 of 320Not in the top three

Sage Intacct6 of 320Not in the top three

Spotlight Reporting6 of 320Not in the top three

Zoho Books5 of 322Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Syft Analytics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 32 answers that named Syft Analytics and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

fathomhq.com9

cubesoftware.com5

highradius.com5

gitnux.org4

softwareadvice.com4

technologyadvice.com4

thecfoclub.com4

worldmetrics.org4

drivetrain.ai3

getapp.com3

Forty-five of the forty-five domain citations in answers naming Syft Analytics came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

fathomhq.com/blog/the-6-best-financial-consolidation-software-solutions-in-20244

technologyadvice.com/blog/financial-services-software/best-financial-reporting-software4

cubesoftware.com/blog/best-financial-reporting-software3

drivetrain.ai/solutions/financial-reporting-software3

ramp.com/blog/financial-reporting-software3

softwareadvice.com/accounting/financial-reporting-comparison3

thecfoclub.com/tools/best-financial-reporting-software3

aibuzz.blog/best-ai-accounting-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Syft Analytics

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Syft Analytics; a claim can dispute any of them.

Joiin / Syft Analytics 1Syft 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Syft Analytics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Syft Analytics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at syftanalytics.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.