Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › oboloo · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

oboloo

25Judge labels
15First choices
0Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in Strategic sourcing for small business buyers
Rank 3 of 127 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In strategic sourcing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named oboloo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Strategic sourcingSpend and procurement11%3 of 1270%7under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 17%
Supplier managementSpend and procurement6%5 of 800%3under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for oboloo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated oboloo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash11002
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast21003
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash10001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash10001
Kimi K210001
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels2
Paraphrase6 labels1
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained14 labels12
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 15 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“one of the very few procurement systems with a free-forever plan... Choose [oboloo] if: You want a clean, modern, zero-dollar cloud tool” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Supplier management · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Completely Free Option: Oboloo ... Choose Oboloo if you need a complete system today for zero cost” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Supplier management · budget prompt · first choice
“Start Here: Try oboloo or Odoo if you want zero cost and core supplier tracking/performance features.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Supplier management · budget prompt · first choice
“The only free-forever procurement software... This is ideal if you want zero upfront costs.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Strategic sourcing · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as oboloo, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and oboloo was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Tradogram21 of 257Not in the top three
Precoro20 of 250Not in the top three
Coupa7 of 250Not in the top three
Procurify6 of 250Not in the top three
SAP Ariba6 of 250Not in the top three
Market Dojo5 of 251Not in the top three
AuraVMS4 of 251Not in the top three
Procol4 of 250Not in the top three
GEP SMART3 of 250Not in the top three
BuyingStation2 of 250Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named oboloo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 25 answers that named oboloo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

softwareconnect.com20
g2.com16
softwareadvice.com15
sourceforge.net15
auravms.com13
tradogram.com13
capterra.com12
walkme.com10
gartner.com9
getapp.com9

132 of the 132 domain citations in answers naming oboloo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as oboloo

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as oboloo; a claim can dispute any of them.
Oboloo 2
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when oboloo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as oboloo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oboloo.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.