Every category where a model named XE Business for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cross-border payments and FX	Treasury and cash	0%	18 of 83	10%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for XE Business yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated XE Business across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	1	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase8 labels1

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“best lower-complexity option for SMB to mid-market companies that want simpler forwards, alerts, and multi-currency accounts” Perplexity Sonar · Cross-border payments · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“For a more cost-effective, user-friendly solution, Xe for Business or Hedgebook are excellent choices.” Mistral Small · Cross-border payments · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“safe and reliable include Wise, Remitly, Revolut, OFX, XE, Western Union, and MoneyGram” Llama 4 Maverick · Cross-border payments · negative prompt · alternative

“OFX / XE Business | Higher volumes ($50K+/mo) | Negotiable rates, good for scaling” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cross-border payments · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“become competitive only when you reach higher monthly volumes (≥$50k) and can negotiate rates” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Cross-border payments · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as XE Business, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and XE Business was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Wise Business9 of 135Not in the top three

OFX8 of 131Not in the top three

Revolut Business7 of 132Not in the top three

Airwallex6 of 131Not in the top three

Corpay Cross-Border5 of 131Not in the top three

GTreasury4 of 131Not in the top three

Nomentia3 of 130Not in the top three

PayPal3 of 130Not in the top three

XTransfer3 of 130Not in the top three

Kyriba2 of 131Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named XE Business. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named XE Business and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

sendmoneycompare.com8

alltopbusiness.com7

blog.ibanfirst.com7

f6s.com7

airwallex.com4

wise.com4

xtransfer.com4

blog.corphedge.com3

chargeflow.io3

guideflow.com3

Fifty of the fifty domain citations in answers naming XE Business came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

alltopbusiness.com/fx-risk-management-suppliers7

blog.ibanfirst.com/en/fx-risk-management-tools7

f6s.com/software/category/currency-risk-management5

f6s.com/software/category/corporate-fx-payments4

blog.corphedge.com/blog/best-forex-hedging-platform-for-sme-63

f6s.com/software/category/corporate-fx-hedging3

f6s.com/software/category/fx-hedging3

guideflow.com/blog/cross-border-payments-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as XE Business

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as XE Business; a claim can dispute any of them.

Xe for Business 4XE 3Xe 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when XE Business's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as XE Business, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at xe.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.