Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Yardi Corom · September 2026 Edition

Yardi · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Yardi Corom

6Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Yardi Corom was named 3 times in Lease accounting, where FinQuery led with 36%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market22 of 60

under the label threshold

Enterprise16 of 52

under the label threshold

In lease accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Yardi Corom for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Lease accounting	Accounting and close	0%	22 of 60	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by FinQuery at 36%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Yardi Corom yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Yardi Corom across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“(Examples: LeaseQuery, FloQast, AssetBase, Yardi). These are often the best fit for a 500-person company.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Lease accounting · scale prompt · alternative

“Best if you want broader real-estate/lease administration depth: Yardi Corom” GPT-5.4 mini · Lease accounting · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Yardi Corom, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Yardi Corom was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

FinQuery6 of 64Not in the top three

Nakisa Lease Administration4 of 62Not in the top three

Visual Lease4 of 60Not in the top three

MRI ProLease3 of 60Not in the top three

NetLease2 of 60Not in the top three

UGAAP2 of 60Not in the top three

Accruent Lucernex1 of 60Not in the top three

Assetbase1 of 60Not in the top three

CoStar Real Estate Manager1 of 60Not in the top three

Crunchafi1 of 60Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Yardi Corom. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 6 answers that named Yardi Corom and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

capterra.com4

blackowlsystems.com1

debtbook.com1

erpresearch.com1

estateray.com1

finantrix.com1

finquery.com1

gartner.com1

getapp.com1

leaseabstractors.com1

Thirteen of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming Yardi Corom came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

capterra.com/lease-accounting-software4

capterra.com/p/143396/LeaseQuery2

blackowlsystems.com/best-lease-accounting-software-in-2026-compared1

capterra.com/compare/190778-214672/QuickBooks-Online-vs-Netgain1

capterra.com/p/143396/LeaseQuery/reviews1

capterra.com/p/147875/iLeasePro1

capterra.com/p/172587/Lease-Administration-by-Nakisa1

capterra.com/p/185851/UGAAP-Lease-Accounting-Software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Yardi Corom

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Yardi Corom; a claim can dispute any of them.

Yardi 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Yardi Corom's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Yardi Corom, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at yardicorom.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.