Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Yooz · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Yooz

15Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Yooz was named 8 times in Accounts payable automat and 1 other category, where Stampli led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business37 of 53

under the label threshold

Mid-market16 of 60

under the label threshold

Enterprise36 of 64

under the label threshold

In accounts payable automat · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Yooz for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Accounts payable automation	Spend and procurement	0%	16 of 60	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Stampli at 19%
Global e-invoicing compliance	Tax and compliance	0%	45 of 108	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Avalara at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Yooz yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Yooz across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Yooz's pricing structure and implementation speed are genuine differentiators” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Accounts payable automat · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for AP Automation + Compliance: Yooz or Medius” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · direct prompt · alternative

“Known for its AI-powered automation” Mistral Small · Accounts payable automat · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Yooz, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Yooz was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Tipalti13 of 154Not in the top three

BILL12 of 150Not in the top three

Stampli9 of 150Not in the top three

AvidXchange8 of 151Not in the top three

Coupa8 of 150Not in the top three

Ramp6 of 151Not in the top three

Medius5 of 152Not in the top three

Basware4 of 150Not in the top three

Pagero3 of 151Not in the top three

Sovos3 of 151Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Yooz. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 15 answers that named Yooz and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

conseroglobal.com6

medius.com6

zoneandco.com6

highradius.com4

makershub.com4

mindsprint.com4

g2.com3

layer3labs.io3

ramp.com3

rillion.com3

Forty-two of the forty-two domain citations in answers naming Yooz came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

conseroglobal.com/resources/best-accounts-payable-software6

zoneandco.com/articles/top-ap-automation-software-solutions6

layer3labs.io/comparisons/best-accounts-payable-automation-software3

makershub.com/blog/best-ap-automation-software3

medius.com/blog/top-ap-automation-software-compared-features-fit-and-tradeoffs3

mindsprint.com/resources/blogs/automated-accounts-payable-software3

rillion.com/blog/best-accounts-payable-automation-software3

xelix.com/resources/accounts-payable-solutions/best-13-accounts-payable-software-solutions3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Yooz's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Yooz, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at yooz.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.