Every category where a model named Booking.com for Business for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate travel management	Spend and procurement	9%	3 of 60	41%	17	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Booking.com for Business yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Booking.com for Business across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	2	1	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labelsNone

Paraphrase6 labels2

Comparative7 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained18 labels12

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative15 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative57 labels in all, every segment counted; 14 of the 15 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the best starting point is usually Booking.com for Business if you want a free, self-service booking platform” Perplexity Sonar · Corporate travel managem · budget prompt · first choice

“Start with Booking.com for Business (truly free) if you have very few bookings, or Engine” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate travel managem · budget prompt · first choice

“Booking.com for Business stands out as the best overall corporate travel booking platform.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate travel managem · budget prompt · first choice

“the best choice is usually Booking.com for Business or Navan’s free/self-serve tier” GPT-5.4 mini · Corporate travel managem · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“ConsumerAffairs shows a ~1.1 rating across thousands of reviews, citing inconsistent pricing, poor support communication” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · hard negative

“Online Travel Agencies (OTAs) like Expedia, Booking.com, Travelocity, and similar sites - Why avoid?” Mistral Small · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · hard negative

“Consumer-Facing OTAs for Business (e.g., Expedia Business, Booking.com) ... Lack of Duty of Care” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · hard negative

“Warning: The platform has faced mounting criticism especially in 2024-2025” MiniMax M2.5 · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Booking.com for Business, over the 57 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Booking.com for Business was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TravelPerk47 of 5711Compare →

Navan46 of 5713Compare →

SAP Concur21 of 572Not in the top three

Ramp20 of 571Not in the top three

Rippling Travel15 of 572Not in the top three

Amex GBT Egencia13 of 570Not in the top three

Engine12 of 571Not in the top three

Brex11 of 570Not in the top three

TravelBank8 of 571Not in the top three

American Express Global Business Travel8 of 570Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Booking.com for Business. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 52 of the 57 answers that named Booking.com for Business and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ottotheagent.com38

rippling.com32

businesstravel.com30

perk.com28

business.booking.comYour site26

g2.com26

learn.g2.com26

navan.com23

routespring.com16

engine.com15

234 of the 260 domain citations in answers naming Booking.com for Business came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

rippling.com/blog/small-business-travel-management-software30

businesstravel.com/blog/best-business-travel-management-software-for-small-and-mid-sized-b29

learn.g2.com/best-travel-management-software26

perk.com/blog/best-travel-management-software-small-business16

ottotheagent.com/blog/best-corporate-travel-apps-self-booking-business-travelers15

oncehub.com/blog/top-travel-management-software14

business.booking.com/en-us/business-travel-resources/blog/the-best-business-travel-managem13

gartner.com/reviews/market/corporate-travel-management-software13

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Booking.com for Business

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Booking.com for Business; a claim can dispute any of them.

Booking.com 7

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Booking.com for Business's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Booking.com for Business, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at booking.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.