Every category where a model named BCD Travel for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate travel management	Spend and procurement	0%	30 of 60	33%	6	under 10 labels · led by Navan at 51%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for BCD Travel yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated BCD Travel across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labels1

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative12 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained6 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Egencia / Amex GBT / CWT / BCD / FCM if you want a managed travel service model.” GPT-5.4 mini · Corporate travel managem · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Rated ~1.4/5 on Trustpilot ... Reviewers call it a "nightmare" and "worst travel company ever," especially for corporate users.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · hard negative

“like American Express GBT or BCd charge per-person-per-month or per-transaction fees” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate travel managem · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as BCD Travel, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BCD Travel was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Navan33 of 3412Not in the top three

SAP Concur29 of 346Not in the top three

TravelPerk25 of 341Not in the top three

American Express Global Business Travel22 of 344Not in the top three

CWT20 of 340Not in the top three

Ramp14 of 344Not in the top three

Amex GBT Egencia14 of 340Not in the top three

Spotnana11 of 340Not in the top three

Brex10 of 341Not in the top three

Engine4 of 341Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BCD Travel. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 34 answers that named BCD Travel and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ottotheagent.com20

navan.com18

gartner.com16

routespring.com16

learn.g2.com14

engine.com13

worldmetrics.org13

g2.com12

itilite.com11

modernbusinesstravel.com11

144 of the 144 domain citations in answers naming BCD Travel came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/corporate-travel-management-software16

learn.g2.com/best-travel-management-software14

modernbusinesstravel.com/corporate/best-corporate-travel-management-platforms-202611

oncehub.com/blog/top-travel-management-software9

worldmetrics.org/best/travel-management-software9

engine.com/blog/corporate-travel-booking-platforms7

expensevisor.com/5-excellent-business-travel-management-tools-for-20247

itilite.com/blog/top-10-travel-management-company-us7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as BCD Travel

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as BCD Travel; a claim can dispute any of them.

BCd 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BCD Travel's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BCD Travel, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at bcdtravel.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.