Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › TravelPerk · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

TravelPerk

145Judge labels
20First choices
21Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
22% in Corporate travel managem for mid-market buyers
Rank 2 of 60 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 10% of its 49 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In corporate travel managem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named TravelPerk for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Corporate travel managementSpend and procurement22%2 of 6010%49accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for TravelPerk yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated TravelPerk across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510304
GPT-5.4 mini13004
Gemini 3.5 Flash13116
Perplexity Sonar01113
Grok 4.1 Fast15017
Mistral Small12104
DeepSeek V4 Flash13116
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash01203
Kimi K231004
GLM 4.7 FlashX11114
MiniMax M2.511103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct31 labels7
Paraphrase17 labels6
Comparative33 labels8not counted in share
Budget-constrained27 labels4
Scale-constrained17 labels3
Negative20 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative145 labels in all, every segment counted; 20 of the 30 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Perk (formerly TravelPerk): Highly rated for customer service, has a massive global inventory, and features "FlexiPerk"” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Corporate travel managem · scale prompt · first choice
“two platforms consistently top rankings for this segment: Navan (formerly TripActions) and Perk (formerly TravelPerk)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate travel managem · direct prompt · first choice
“Particularly relevant for SMBs and mid-market companies that want flexible booking without enterprise complexity” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Corporate travel managem · direct prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Mid-Market ... Start with Perk (TravelPerk) if you want a cost-effective, scalable solution” Kimi K2 · Corporate travel managem · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Frequent complaints about: Customer support teams based in Spain... Consistently higher prices than competitors plus hidden booking fees” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · hard negative
“their hotel pre-payment system can take a highly frustrating amount of time to process refunds” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · soft negative
“Customer service frequently criticized as unhelpful, slow, and frustrating.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · soft negative
“Perk has unhappy Trustpilot users (e.g., "worst booking service")” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as TravelPerk, over the 141 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TravelPerk was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Navan127 of 14144Compare →
SAP Concur95 of 14113Not in the top three
Ramp56 of 1416Not in the top three
Amex GBT Egencia49 of 1410Not in the top three
Brex36 of 1412Not in the top three
American Express Global Business Travel33 of 1414Not in the top three
BCD Travel25 of 1412Not in the top three
Rippling Travel21 of 1412Not in the top three
Spotnana21 of 1410Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TravelPerk. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 119 of the 141 answers that named TravelPerk and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as TravelPerk

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as TravelPerk; a claim can dispute any of them.
Perk (formerly TravelPerk) 15Perk 8Perk (Formerly TravelPerk) 1Perk (TravelPerk) 1Perk/TravelPerk 1TravelPerk (Perk) 1TravelPerk (now "Perk") 1TravelPerk (now Perk) 1TravelPerk / Perk 1TravelPerk/Perk 1TravelPerk/Perk Starter 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TravelPerk's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TravelPerk, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at travelperk.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack