Every category where a model named Engine for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate travel management	Spend and procurement	4%	5 of 60	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Navan at 51%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Engine yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Engine across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained8 labels3

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative4 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Engine (free, no contract, with corporate rates and consolidated billing) if you want a more robust managed solution without fees” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate travel managem · budget prompt · first choice

“If you want completely free: Routespring or Engine” MiniMax M2.5 · Corporate travel managem · budget prompt · first choice

“Prioritize highly rated ones like Engine (free, good reviews)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · first choice

“Perk or Engine: Free/low-cost, hotel-focused savings (up to 26%), easy start.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate travel managem · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Engine, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Engine was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Navan19 of 234Not in the top three

TravelPerk19 of 233Not in the top three

SAP Concur13 of 233Not in the top three

Booking.com for Business12 of 232Not in the top three

Ramp11 of 231Not in the top three

Brex9 of 231Not in the top three

Amex GBT Egencia5 of 230Not in the top three

TravelBank4 of 232Not in the top three

BCD Travel4 of 230Not in the top three

Zoho Expense4 of 230Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Engine. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 23 answers that named Engine and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ottotheagent.com16

navan.com14

engine.comYour site13

learn.g2.com11

perk.com11

rippling.com11

g2.com10

business.booking.com9

businesstravel.com9

brex.com7

Ninety-eight of the 111 domain citations in answers naming Engine came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-travel-management-software11

rippling.com/blog/small-business-travel-management-software10

engine.com/blog/corporate-travel-booking-platforms9

businesstravel.com/blog/best-business-travel-management-software-for-small-and-mid-sized-b8

ottotheagent.com/blog/best-corporate-travel-apps-self-booking-business-travelers8

brex.com/spend-trends/corporate-travel-management/best-business-travel-management-software6

engine.com/6

tekpon.com/insights/saas-operations/strategy/best-corporate-travel-management-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Engine's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Engine, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at engine.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.