Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Corporify · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Corporify

28Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Entity management for mid-market buyers
Rank 18 of 87 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 12 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In entity management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Corporify for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Entity managementEquity and corporate0%18 of 870%12accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Corporify yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Corporify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500202
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast01304
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative16 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative28 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best if entity housekeeping (org charts, docs, international compliance) is your core need.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Entity management · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Smaller corporate secretarial teams: Corporify, MinuteBox, or EntityKeeper” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Entity management · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Corporify, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Corporify was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
EntityKeeper22 of 283Not in the top three
Athennian22 of 282Not in the top three
Diligent Entities22 of 282Not in the top three
CSC Entity Management14 of 280Not in the top three
Carta12 of 282Not in the top three
DiliTrust Governance Suite11 of 280Not in the top three
Filejet10 of 281Not in the top three
Computershare GEMS10 of 280Not in the top three
MinuteBox9 of 280Not in the top three
Wolters Kluwer Legisway8 of 280Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Corporify. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 28 answers that named Corporify and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

capterra.com19
coverpin.com18
getapp.com18
worldmetrics.org18
techbullion.com17
g2.com14
zipdo.co14
wifitalents.com11
gitnux.org10
softwareadvice.com10

149 of the 149 domain citations in answers naming Corporify came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Corporify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Corporify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at corporify.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack