Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Easy Month End · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Easy Month End

9Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Easy Month End was named 1 time in Financial close manageme, where FloQast led with 60%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business10 of 87

under the label threshold

Mid-market41 of 68

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In financial close manageme · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Easy Month End for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Financial close management	Accounting and close	0%	41 of 68	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 60%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Easy Month End yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Easy Month End across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Easy Month End, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Easy Month End was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

FloQast7 of 91Not in the top three

BlackLine7 of 90Not in the top three

Numeric6 of 93Not in the top three

Double4 of 91Not in the top three

Finlens3 of 92Not in the top three

PivotXL3 of 91Not in the top three

QuickBooks Online2 of 92Not in the top three

Xero2 of 92Not in the top three

Planful2 of 90Not in the top three

Close1 of 90Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Easy Month End. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Easy Month End and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

numeric.io9

learn.g2.com8

financial-cents.com7

dokka.com6

doublehq.com5

finlens.app5

capterra.com4

g2.com4

getapp.com4

erpresearch.com3

Fifty-five of the fifty-five domain citations in answers naming Easy Month End came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

numeric.io/blog/financial-close-software9

learn.g2.com/best-financial-close-software8

financial-cents.com/resources/articles/best-month-end-close-software7

dokka.com/best-financial-close-software-for-small-businesses6

finlens.app/blogs/month-end-close-tools5

capterra.com/financial-close-software/s/small-businesses4

doublehq.com/blog/best-close-management-systems-for-finance-teams4

getapp.com/all-software/financial-close/org/small-business4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Easy Month End's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Easy Month End, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at easymonthend.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.