Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › NEWTON · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

NEWTON

4Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. NEWTON was named 1 time in Entity management, where Athennian led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business13 of 73

under the label threshold

Mid-market59 of 87

under the label threshold

Enterprise28 of 83

under the label threshold

In entity management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named NEWTON for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Entity management	Equity and corporate	0%	59 of 87	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Athennian at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for NEWTON yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated NEWTON across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 label1

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as NEWTON, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and NEWTON was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Diligent Entities4 of 40Not in the top three

Athennian3 of 42Not in the top three

CSC Entity Management3 of 41Not in the top three

EntityKeeper3 of 40Not in the top three

CT Corporation Entity Management2 of 40Not in the top three

Wolters Kluwer Legisway2 of 40Not in the top three

CSC / CT Corporation1 of 40Not in the top three

Carta1 of 40Not in the top three

Commenda1 of 40Not in the top three

Corporify1 of 40Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named NEWTON. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named NEWTON and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

kurums.com4

teamed.global4

diligent.com3

get-newton.com3

worldmetrics.org3

checkthat.ai2

coverpin.com2

discern.com2

f6s.com2

g2.com2

Twenty-seven of the twenty-seven domain citations in answers naming NEWTON came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

kurums.com/best-entity-management-software-2026-comparison4

diligent.com/products/entities3

get-newton.com/pricing3

teamed.global/insights/pricing-models-for-entity-management-software-guide3

worldmetrics.org/best/entity-management-software3

checkthat.ai/brands/diligent/pricing2

coverpin.com/resources/top-10-entity-management-tools-compared2

diligent.com/en-gb/solutions/entity-management-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as NEWTON

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as NEWTON; a claim can dispute any of them.

Newton 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when NEWTON's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as NEWTON, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at newton.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.