One category · what the models named insteadAlternatives to Persefoni, as AI models named them
In the September 2026 Edition, 166 of the 216 answers collected in the one category where Persefoni holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.
ESG and carbon reporting
Sixty-one of the seventy-two answers did not name Persefoni; it was the first choice in four. The first choices in those sixty-one answers, eighteen products in all, the eight most named:
Fifty-five of the seventy-two answers did not name Persefoni; it was the first choice in three. The first choices in those fifty-five answers, thirteen products in all, the eight most named:
Fifty of the seventy-two answers did not name Persefoni; it was the first choice in three. The first choices in those fifty answers, twelve products in all, the eight most named:
How to read this
A category is asked six ways of each of twelve models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is seventy-two answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled Persefoni neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named Persefoni only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from Persefoni's side.
Every answer and every label is in the free record. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of Persefoni was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.