Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Procol · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Procol

14Judge labels

2First choices

2Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Procol was named 8 times in Strategic sourcing, where Precoro led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business10 of 150

under the label threshold

Mid-market11 of 127

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In strategic sourcing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Procol for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Strategic sourcing	Spend and procurement	2%	11 of 127	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Procol yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Procol across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	2	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labels1

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Procol if your priority is a more focused e-sourcing/RFP tool with strong RFx and eAuction features” Perplexity Sonar · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Best for a growing business that needs a straightforward and budget-friendly way to organize purchasing” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Strategic sourcing · budget prompt · alternative

“described as suitable for small and mid-sized businesses looking for affordable procurement tools” Perplexity Sonar · Strategic sourcing · budget prompt · alternative

“Procol: Focuses heavily on spend analytics and basic procurement automation.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Strategic sourcing · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Procol, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Procol was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Tradogram8 of 144Not in the top three

Precoro6 of 141Not in the top three

ProcurePort6 of 140Not in the top three

SAP Ariba5 of 140Not in the top three

oboloo4 of 143Not in the top three

GEP SMART3 of 142Not in the top three

Coupa3 of 140Not in the top three

Market Dojo3 of 140Not in the top three

SourceRFX2 of 140Not in the top three

Zapro2 of 140Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Procol. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named Procol and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

softwareconnect.com12

walkme.com11

g2.com9

gartner.com8

softwareadvice.com8

sourceforge.net6

entproc.com5

kurums.com5

softwaresuggest.com5

tropicapp.io5

Seventy-four of the seventy-four domain citations in answers naming Procol came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-strategic-sourcing-software12

walkme.com/blog/best-strategic-sourcing-software11

g2.com/categories/strategic-sourcing/small-business8

softwareadvice.com/scm/strategic-sourcing-software-comparison8

gartner.com/reviews/market/strategic-sourcing-application-suites6

g2.com/categories/strategic-sourcing5

kurums.com/best-strategic-sourcing-software-2026-comparison5

softwaresuggest.com/strategic-sourcing-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Procol's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Procol, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at procol.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.