Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › SAP Enterprise Performance Management · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

SAP Enterprise Performance Management

8Judge labels

0First choices

3Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SAP Enterprise Performance Management was named 2 times in Corporate performance ma, where Planful led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business83 of 88

under the label threshold

Mid-market80 of 95

under the label threshold

Enterprise16 of 68

under the label threshold

In corporate performance ma · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SAP Enterprise Performance Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate performance management	Planning and analysis	0%	80 of 95	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Planful at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SAP Enterprise Performance Management yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SAP Enterprise Performance Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Usually not best for tight budgets: OneStream, SAP EPM, and Oracle EPM Enterprise” GPT-5.4 mini · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAP Enterprise Performance Management, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP Enterprise Performance Management was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OneStream8 of 83Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM8 of 81Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning7 of 81Not in the top three

Anaplan5 of 82Not in the top three

CCH Tagetik3 of 80Not in the top three

Pigment3 of 80Not in the top three

Planful3 of 80Not in the top three

Board2 of 80Not in the top three

Drivetrain2 of 80Not in the top three

Vena2 of 80Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP Enterprise Performance Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named SAP Enterprise Performance Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

drivetrain.ai6

onestream.com5

peoplemanagingpeople.com5

golimelight.com4

lupahire.com4

selecthub.com4

thecfoclub.com4

b-eye.com3

docs.oracle.com3

gbhackers.com3

Forty-one of the forty-one domain citations in answers naming SAP Enterprise Performance Management came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

drivetrain.ai/solutions/enterprise-performance-management-software6

onestream.com/blog/best-epm-software5

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/epm-software5

lupahire.com/blog/enterprise-performance-management-software4

selecthub.com/c/epm-software4

thecfoclub.com/tools/best-epm-software4

gbhackers.com/best-epm-tools-compared-23

golimelight.com/blog/best-epm-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SAP Enterprise Performance Management

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP Enterprise Performance Management; a claim can dispute any of them.

SAP EPM 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP Enterprise Performance Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP Enterprise Performance Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sap.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.