Every category where a model named Spacebase for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Lease accounting	Accounting and close	2%	11 of 60	12%	8	under 10 labels · led by FinQuery at 36%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Spacebase yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Spacebase across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct17 labels5

Paraphrase3 labels1

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the strongest default choice is Spacebase if you want a platform specifically called out as best for the B2B sector” Perplexity Sonar · Lease accounting · direct prompt · first choice

“If your primary focus is B2B-specific needs, Spacebase is purpose-built for that sector.” MiniMax M2.5 · Lease accounting · direct prompt · alternative

“It was explicitly highlighted as a leader for the B2B sector.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Lease accounting · direct prompt · alternative

“Uniquely positioned to handle "soft assets."” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Mid‑tier (25–150 employees, 10–50 leases) – but some mid‑size firms use it” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Lease accounting · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Spacebase, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Spacebase was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

FinQuery17 of 268Not in the top three

Visual Lease16 of 264Not in the top three

EZLease11 of 261Not in the top three

Trullion9 of 260Not in the top three

MRI ProLease8 of 260Not in the top three

Nakisa Lease Administration7 of 262Not in the top three

Black Owl Systems6 of 262Not in the top three

SOFT4Lessee6 of 262Not in the top three

LeaseAccelerator6 of 260Not in the top three

Xero5 of 260Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Spacebase. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 26 answers that named Spacebase and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

softwareconnect.com25

gartner.com17

acquisition-international.com15

debtbook.com15

blackowlsystems.com13

capterra.com13

guideflow.com12

impakter.com11

netgain.tech11

g2.com10

142 of the 142 domain citations in answers naming Spacebase came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-lease-accounting-software24

gartner.com/reviews/market/lease-accounting-and-management-software17

acquisition-international.com/best-lease-accounting-software-of-2026-from-compliance-to-ca15

debtbook.com/blog/best-lease-accounting-software15

guideflow.com/blog/lease-accounting-software12

impakter.com/best-lease-accounting-software11

netgain.tech/blog/best-lease-accounting-software10

blackowlsystems.com/best-lease-accounting-software-in-2026-compared9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Spacebase's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Spacebase, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at spacebaseapp.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.