Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Wolters Kluwer · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Wolters Kluwer

11Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Wolters Kluwer was named 2 times in Entity management and 1 other category, where Athennian led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business54 of 73

under the label threshold

Mid-market63 of 87

under the label threshold

Enterprise29 of 83

under the label threshold

In entity management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Wolters Kluwer for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Entity management	Equity and corporate	0%	63 of 87	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Athennian at 18%
ESG and carbon reporting	Equity and corporate	0%	49 of 76	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Sweep at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Wolters Kluwer yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Wolters Kluwer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Heavy industries (manufacturing, oil & gas, mining) requiring deep EHS ... operational tracking.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Wolters Kluwer, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wolters Kluwer was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workiva6 of 115Not in the top three

Watershed4 of 111Not in the top three

SAP Sustainability Control Tower4 of 110Not in the top three

Sweep3 of 112Not in the top three

Diligent Entities3 of 111Not in the top three

Computershare GEMS3 of 110Not in the top three

IBM Envizi3 of 110Not in the top three

Sphera3 of 110Not in the top three

Lextree2 of 111Not in the top three

Athennian2 of 110Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wolters Kluwer. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 11 answers that named Wolters Kluwer and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

coolset.com3

coverpin.com3

discern.com3

gartner.com3

guideflow.com3

pulsora.com3

softwareadvice.com3

wolterskluwer.comYour site3

worldmetrics.org3

berkmansolutions.com2

Twenty-six of the twenty-nine domain citations in answers naming Wolters Kluwer came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

coolset.com/academy/best-esg-reporting-software-tools3

coverpin.com/resources/top-10-entity-management-tools-compared3

gartner.com/reviews/market/esg-management-and-reporting-software3

guideflow.com/blog/esg-reporting-software3

pulsora.com/blog/best-esg-reporting-software3

bigeasymagazine.com/2026/08/26/7-best-esg-reporting-and-disclosure-software-ranked-and-rev2

esg-one.co/blog/esg-reporting-software-comparison2

gitwiki.org/best-esg-reporting-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Wolters Kluwer

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Wolters Kluwer; a claim can dispute any of them.

Wolters Kluwer (Enablon / CP & ESG) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wolters Kluwer's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wolters Kluwer, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at wolterskluwer.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.