Supplier management
Asked as “supplier management software”, and as “vendor onboarding and information management platform”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 57 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
14Precoro14Procurify09Tradogram63others
14% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Precoro (14%) replaces Procurify (26% then, 12% now), 2 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Precoro leads at 14%, replacing Procurify, which led at 26% and stands at 12% now: 2 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Precoro27%Contested▼−12Since September 2026: 40% → 28%, −12 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketPrecoro14%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Precoro (14%) replaces Procurify (26% then, 12% now), 2 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.This pageEnterprise
SAP Ariba35%Contested▼−2Since September 2026: 40% → 37%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Precoro27%Contested▼−12Since September 2026: 40% → 28%, −12 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketPrecoro14%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Precoro (14%) replaces Procurify (26% then, 12% now), 2 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.This pageEnterpriseSAP Ariba35%Contested▼−2Since September 2026: 40% → 37%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Precoro14%10%39accepted challenger▼−9Since September 2026: 23% → 14%, −9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.23% → 14%
Precoro14%10%39accepted challenger▼−9Since September 2026: 23% → 14%, −9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.23% → 14%02
Procurify14%12%24accepted challenger▼−13Since September 2026: 26% → 12%, −13 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.26% → 12%
Procurify14%12%24accepted challenger▼−13Since September 2026: 26% → 12%, −13 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.26% → 12%03
Tradogram9%0%11accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 6% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 8%
Tradogram9%0%11accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 6% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 8%04
Coupa7%36%45criticized challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 8%
Coupa7%36%45criticized challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 8%05
Gatekeeper5%0%19accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 4%
Gatekeeper5%0%19accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 4%06
Payhawk5%0%11accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
Payhawk5%0%11accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%07
Ivalua4%14%22accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
Ivalua4%14%22accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%08
Kodiak Hub2%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Kodiak Hub2%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%09
Zip2%20%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Zip2%20%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13SAP Ariba0%57%42criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
SAP Ariba0%57%42criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%12
Jaggaer0%29%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Jaggaer0%29%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11
HICX0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
HICX0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%10
GEP SMART0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
GEP SMART0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Precoro vs GatekeeperPrecoro vs PayhawkPrecoro vs IvaluaPrecoro vs Kodiak HubProcurify vs TradogramProcurify vs CoupaProcurify vs GatekeeperProcurify vs PayhawkProcurify vs IvaluaProcurify vs Kodiak HubTradogram vs CoupaTradogram vs GatekeeperTradogram vs PayhawkTradogram vs IvaluaTradogram vs Kodiak HubCoupa vs GatekeeperCoupa vs PayhawkCoupa vs IvaluaCoupa vs Kodiak HubGatekeeper vs PayhawkGatekeeper vs IvaluaGatekeeper vs Kodiak HubPayhawk vs IvaluaPayhawk vs Kodiak HubIvalua vs Kodiak Hub
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910111213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Precoro14%
Precoro14%02Procurify14%
Procurify14%03Tradogram9%
Tradogram9%04Coupa7%
Coupa7%05Gatekeeper5%
Gatekeeper5%06Payhawk5%
Payhawk5%07Ivalua4%
Ivalua4%08Kodiak Hub2%
Kodiak Hub2%09Zip2%
Zip2%10GEP SMART0%
GEP SMART0%11HICX0%
HICX0%12Jaggaer0%
Jaggaer0%13SAP Ariba0%
SAP Ariba0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
SAP Ariba57%
24 of 42 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“This is the platform with the most significant and consistent negative feedback." ... "Small-to-mid companies, vendors forced to use it, anyone who values user experience” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Coupa36%
16 of 45 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“### 2. **Coupa** ⚠️ **Common complaints:** - **Clunky, poorly designed UI** - described as "unworkable"” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Jaggaer29%
5 of 17 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“What to Avoid - **Enterprise solutions like Jaggaer** — Start at ~$45,000/year, far beyond limited budgets” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Precoro10%
4 of 39 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“consider **Precoro**\u2014but it may not fit a very limited budget: its published plans start at **$499/month**” GPT-6 Luna, budget prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1079 links across 248 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
vendor site · Guideflow27 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
vendor site · HighRadius26 answers · 31 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G224 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Spendflo22 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Payhawk22 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G219 answers · 45 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Precoro18 answers · 28 citations · 11 models
18 answers · 20 citations · 11 models
17 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
17 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Ramp15 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Striven15 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
25 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 12 models
16 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best supplier management software”, “supplier management platforms”, “supplier management software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precoro precoro.com | 14% | 283 | 1,000 | 3 | 82,966 | 86 | ||
| Procurify procurify.com | 14% | 220 | 4,400 | 43 | 62,225 | $282 | 14 | 8 |
| Tradogram tradogram.com | 9% | 151 | 880 | 4 | 208,129 | 1 | ||
| oboloo oboloo.com | 9% | 37 | 20 | 0 | 11,787 | |||
| Coupa coupa.com | 7% | 674 | 60,500 | 1,210 | 41,319 | $339 | 91 | |
| Gatekeeper gatekeeperhq.com | 5% | 41 | 40,500 | 3,731 | 69,315 | $83,492 | 20 | 5 |
| Payhawk payhawk.com | 5% | 115 | 2,400 | 27 | 5,824 | 21 | 4 | |
| Ivalua ivalua.com | 4% | 258 | 3,600 | 87 | 35,515 | 80 | ||
| PaymentWorks paymentworks.com | 4% | 5 | ||||||
| Kodiak Hub kodiakhub.com | 2% | 18 | 210 | 1 | 4,319 | 22 | 9 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (highradius.com, payhawk.com). The first result for “best supplier management software” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best supplier management software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which vendor onboarding and information management platform would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top supplier management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best supplier management software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a supplier management software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which supplier management platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5ProcurifyKissflow ProcurementChangedSAP AribaPrecoro, Tradogramno first choiceagainst: CobbleStone Software, Coupa, Omnea, SAP Ariba, Zip
Four alternatives
Coupa, HICX, Jaggaer, Kodiak HubThree alternatives
Gatekeeper, Paylocity, PrecoroFive alternatives
Coupa, GEP SMART, Ivalua, Jaggaer Supplier Management, Kodiak HubTwo alternatives
Bitrix24, Kissflow ProcurementGPT-5.4 miniCoupa, IvaluaTipalti Supplier ManagementChangedagainst: Coupa, SAP AribaSAP AribaVendorappagainst: SAP Ariba, SourceDayno first choiceagainst: Ethixbase360, Orderwise, Risk Ledger, SAP Ariba
Two alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement, SAP Ariba Supplier RiskThree alternatives
Gatekeeper, Precoro, TrustpairTwo alternatives
Coupa Supplier Portal, JAGGAER Supplier Management & PerformanceOne alternative
ProcureDeskGemini 3.5 FlashProcurifyagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement, SAP AribaGraphiteConnectChangedagainst: Coupa, Jaggaer, SAP Aribano first choiceMitti, obolooProcurifyagainst: Coupa, SAP Aribaagainst: Coupa, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle NetSuite, Oracle SCM, SAP Ariba, Sage
Eight alternatives
ComplianceQuest, Gatekeeper, Graphite Connect, Ironclad, Kodiak Hub, Precoro, Vertice, ZipFour alternatives
Gatekeeper, Precoro, Procurify, TipaltiEight alternatives
Airtable, BuyingStation, MRPeasy, Precoro, Softr, Tradogram, Zoho Books, Zoho CreatorSix alternatives
CloudEagle, Gatekeeper, Omnea, Precoro, Tropic, ZipPerplexity SonarPayhawkZipChangedagainst: Coupa, SAP Aribano first choiceoboloono first choiceagainst: Precoro, SAP Ariba, TradeGecko
One alternative
PrecoroOne alternative
Kodiak HubThree alternatives
QuickBooks Online, Ramp, Zoho ProcurementGrok 4.1 FastCoupaPaymentWorksChangedagainst: AravoCoupa, Ivalua, SAP Aribaobolooagainst: Precoro, Procurify, SAP Aribano first choiceagainst: Coupa, Ivalua, SAP Ariba, UpGuard, Vanta, Zip
Four alternatives
Payhawk, Precoro, Procurify, SAP AribaFour alternatives
Expent, Precoro, Tradogram, VendorplySix alternatives
Avetta, Exiger, GEP SMART, HICX, Jaggaer, SourceDayOne alternative
TradogramMistral SmallKodiak Hub, ProcurifyGatekeeperChangedno first choiceQuickBooks Online, Rampno first choicenothing named
One alternative
PayhawkOne alternative
PrecoroTwo alternatives
Market Dojo, PrecoroDeepSeek V4 FlashGatekeeperagainst: Coupa, Ivalua, SAP AribaPaymentWorksChangedno first choiceTradogramagainst: ControlHub, Coupa, Precoro, Procurifyno first choiceagainst: SAP Aribaagainst: Coupa, Ivalua, Jaggaer, SAP Ariba
Three alternatives
Kodiak Hub, Precoro, ProcurifyTwo alternatives
Graphite Connect, PrecoroTen alternatives
Aravo, Coupa, GEP SMART, HICX, HighRadius, Ivalua, Jaggaer, SAP Ariba, SourceDay, ZycusThree alternatives
Odoo, Ramp, obolooLlama 4 MaverickPrecoroHighRadiusChangedno first choiceSpendwiseno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Coupa, GEP SMART, Ivalua, PayhawkFour alternatives
Coupa, HICX, Kissflow Procurement, KognitosThree alternatives
Precoro, QuickBooks Online, RampQwen 3.7 FlashCoupaagainst: Workday Buying & SourcingVendormateChangedagainst: Coupa, Jaggaer, SAP Aribano first choiceTradogramagainst: Coupa, SAP AribaCoupa, Ivalua, Precoro, Procuriagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement, SAP Aribaagainst: Oracle Fusion Procurement, SAP Ariba, SAP S/4HANA, Tierion
Three alternatives
HighRadius, Ivalua, ZycusTwo alternatives
Datasource, TipaltiFive alternatives
Coupa, Ivalua, Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement, SAP Ariba, Zapro AIThree alternatives
Precoro, QuickBooks Online, RampKimi K2ProcurifyPrecoroChangedagainst: SAP Aribano first choiceobolooagainst: Jaggaerno first choiceagainst: Coupa, Cvent Vendor Marketplace, SAP Ariba, Sievo
Three alternatives
Precoro, ProcureDesk, ZipTwo alternatives
Gatekeeper, ProcurifyThree alternatives
Precoro, Procurify, TradogramGLM 4.7 FlashXPrecoroagainst: Coupa, SAP AribaPrecoroHeldCoupa, Ivalua, SAP AribaPipefy, Tradogramno first choiceagainst: Avetta Connect
Three alternatives
Gatekeeper, Procurify, SAP Business OneOne alternative
ProcureDeskTen alternatives
Beroe, GEP SMART, HICX, Jaggaer, Kinaxis, Raindrop Systems, SAP Business One, VISCO, Zoho Inventory, ZycusTwo alternatives
Kissflow Procurement, PrecoroMiniMax M2.5Payhawk, Precoroagainst: ProcurifyProcurifyChangedno first choiceOdoo, Zoho Inventoryno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Striven, ZipFour alternatives
Coupa, Eftsure, Gatekeeper, HighRadiusFour alternatives
Coupa, Ivalua, Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement, SAP AribaTwo alternatives
Precoro, ProcurifyGPT-6 LunaPrecoroagainst: CoupaGatekeeperChangedno first choiceERPNextagainst: Precorono first choiceagainst: Coupa, Jaggaer, SAP Ariba
Two alternatives
Kodiak Hub, ProcurifyTwo alternatives
Tipalti, ZipSix alternatives
Coupa, GEP SMART, Ivalua, Jaggaer, Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement, SAP AribaMuse Glimmer 30BPayhawk, ProcurifyProcurifyChangedCoupa, SAP AribaTradogram, oboloono first choiceagainst: HICX, SAP Ariba, SAP S/4HANA
Four alternatives
Coupa, Gatekeeper, Kodiak Hub, PrecoroTwo alternatives
Kodiak Hub, PrecoroSeven alternatives
Aravo, Avetta, Certa, EcoVadis, Ivalua, Jaggaer, PayhawkTwo alternatives
Ramp, Zoho CreatorBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:34 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:20 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:33 | yes | 25 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 18 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:53 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:19 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:42 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:30 | no | 0 | 39 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:08 | yes | 20 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:50 | yes | 23 | 65 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:02 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 4 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:40 | yes | 15 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 19 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:08 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 29 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:49 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:40 | yes | 24 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 14 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:07 | yes | 21 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:48 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:54 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:16 | yes | 25 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:58 | yes | 21 | 37 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:21 | yes | 22 | 46 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:33 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:42 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:13 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:13 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:21 | yes | 21 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:28 | yes | 18 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:40 | yes | 23 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:35 | yes | 8 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 25 | 66 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:20 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:58 | yes | 15 | 47 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 14 | 35 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:35 | yes | 18 | 204 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:59 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:55 | yes | 7 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:35 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:19 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:51 | yes | 18 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:04 | yes | 17 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 24 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:35 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 24 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:08 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:39 | yes | 15 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:20 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:44 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:16 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:38 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:37 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:37 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:49 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:43 | yes | 14 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:12 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:22 | yes | 18 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:08 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:43 | yes | 9 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:42 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:57 | no | 0 | 120 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:49 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:24 | yes | 1 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:16 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:04 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:50 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:37 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:46 | yes | 22 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:02 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:51 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:38 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:04 | yes | 23 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:28 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:19 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:38 | yes | 25 | 29 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Kissflow read as Kissflow Procurement
Microsoft Dynamics read as Microsoft Dynamics 365
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
Oracle read as Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement
Oracle Procurement read as Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement
Oracle Procurement Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement
SAP Ariba / SAP Business Network read as SAP Ariba
Zapro read as Zapro AI
Unresolved, counted raw
Avetta Connect
Beroe
Certa
Cvent Vendor Marketplace
Datasource
Ethixbase360
Expent
GraphiteConnect
Ironclad
JAGGAER Supplier Management & Performance
Jaggaer Supplier Management
Ncontracts
Oracle Fusion Procurement
Orderwise
Procuri
Raindrop Systems
Risk Ledger
SAP Ariba Supplier Risk
SBS Vendor Management
SIM (Supplier Information Management) Systems
Sievo
Snappy Supplier
SupplierSoft
Tealbook
Tierion
Tipalti Supplier Management
Vendorapp
Workday Buying & Sourcing
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.