AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Spend and procurement › October 2026 Edition

Telecom expense management

Asked as “telecom expense management platform”, and as “wireless and telecom bill management service”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 48 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
19%
Contested · Lightyear 12%
19Genuity12Lightyear12vCom Solutions56others

19% of first choices, contested.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Genuity19%7%14accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 19% now.
02Lightyear12%3%30accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 12% now.
03vCom Solutions12%5%19accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 12% now.
04Mindglobal10%0%13accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 10% now.
05Calero6%39%46criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 6% now.
06Brightfin4%16%25accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now.
07Sakon2%34%32criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
08Tangoe One Telecom0%53%45criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Genuity19%
02Lightyear12%
03vCom Solutions12%
04Mindglobal10%
05Calero6%
06Brightfin4%
07Sakon2%
08Tangoe One Telecom0%

What they warned about

One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Tangoe One Telecom
53%
24 of 45 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“platforms you should approach with caution or avoid: 1. **Tangoe** - **Issues:** Users frequently report an aging interface, a steep and complex onboarding process, and inconsistent support quality.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Calero
39%
18 of 46 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Users report slow data reporting, delayed updates when requesting changes, and poor customer support” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Sakon
34%
11 of 32 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“What to Avoid for Mid-Market” DeepSeek V4 Flash, direct prompt
Brightfin
16%
4 of 25 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“brightfin:** Acquired by **Proven Optics**” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1092 links across 173 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.

46 answers · 67 citations · 14 models
vendor site · G231 answers · 57 citations · 12 models
30 answers · 32 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Mindglobal29 answers · 54 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Socium IT27 answers · 45 citations · 10 models
27 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
25 answers · 33 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Expensify25 answers · 25 citations · 11 models
24 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
22 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Lightyear22 answers · 28 citations · 8 models
vendor site · GetApp21 answers · 27 citations · 9 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best telecom expense management platform”, “telecom expense management platform”, “telecom expense management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Genuity gogenuity.com19%624,4001891,6910
Lightyear lightyear.ai
Lightyear 12%, Lightyear.ai 2%
15%7133,10017,74533,552224
vCom Solutions vcomsolutions.com12%322604263
Mindglobal mindglobal.com10%2521021679
Zoho parent site
Zoho Expense 6%
6%1865,40052
Calero calero.com6%1283,6002961,930$4,74314
ClearSight TEMs6%
Brightfin brightfin.com4%7272011388
Clearview4%27,1002,426
Upland Cimpl uplandsoftware.com2%2910067,149$1,203266

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 12 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (gartner.com, lightyear.ai, mindglobal.com, uplandsoftware.com, use.expensify.com). The first result for “best telecom expense management platform” is gartner.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best telecom expense management platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which wireless and telecom bill management service would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top telecom expense management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best telecom expense management platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a telecom expense management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which telecom expense management platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Lightyear
Four alternativesCimpl, Tangoe One Telecom, Valicom's Clearview, vCom Solutions
Comview, vCom SolutionsChanged
Two alternativesCalero-MDSL, ClearSight
no first choiceGenuity
Three alternativesLightyear, MobilityCentral by Visage Mobile, Sakon
no first choiceagainst: Brightfin, Calero, Tangoe One Telecom
GPT-5.4 miniCalero
Three alternativesSakon, Tangoe One Telecom, Valicom Clearview
against: Lightyear
ClearviewChanged
Three alternativesLINQ Qonnect, Motus, Tangoe One Telecom
no first choiceTemprix
Two alternativesSakon, Tangoe One Telecom
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashLightyear
Four alternativesBrightfin, Mindglobal, vCom Solutions, vManager
against: Calero, Tangoe One Telecom
LightyearHeld
Three alternativesBrightfin, Sakon, vCom Solutions
Tangoe One Telecom
Six alternativesAsignet, Brightfin, Calero, Lightyear, Sakon, vCom Solutions
Genuity
Four alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Lightyear, Ramp, Vigilis
against: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom
Mindglobal, Tellennium, vCom Solutions
Three alternativesBrightfin, Lightyear, Sakon
against: Brightfin, Calero-MDSL, Cass Information Systems, Tangoe One Telecom, Tellennium, vCom Solutions
Perplexity SonarBrightfin
Three alternativesClearview, Lightyear, vCom Solutions
against: Calero, Sakon
LightyearChanged
One alternativeComview
against: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom
no first choiceMicrocall
One alternativeLINQ Qonnect
no first choiceagainst: Calero, Tangoe One Telecom
Grok 4.1 FastSakon, vCom Solutions
Three alternativesCalero, Genuity, Valicom
against: Tangoe One Telecom
ClearSight TEMsChanged
Four alternativesCalero, Cass Info Systems, Tangoe One Telecom, Vigilis
Tangoe One Telecom
Eight alternativesCalero, Cass Information Systems, Clearview, Lightyear, MDM Telecom, Upland Cimpl, Vigilis, vCom vManager
Genuity
Three alternativesLightyear, Sierra Gold, Zoho Expense
against: Calero, Tangoe One Telecom
Calero
Four alternativesCimpl, Lightyear, Tangoe One Telecom, Temforce
against: Calero, Tangoe TEM
Mistral SmallClearSight TEMs, LINQ QonnectLightyearChanged
Three alternativesClearview, Spenza, WidePoint
against: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom
Calero MDS TEM, Sakon
One alternativeSierra Gold
Genuityno first choiceagainst: Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom
DeepSeek V4 FlashMindglobal, vCom Solutions
Three alternativesCimpl, Lightyear, Valicom
against: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom
MindglobalChanged
Three alternativesCalero, Valicom, vCom Solutions
against: Tangoe One Telecom
Tangoe One Telecom
Four alternativesAvotus, Calero, Sakon, Upland Cimpl
Genuity
Two alternativesValicom, Zoho Expense
no first choiceagainst: Asentinel, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom
Llama 4 MaverickClearSight TEMs
One alternativeLINQ Qonnect
no first choiceChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashBrightfin
Two alternativesRadiusPoint, vCom Solutions
against: Calero, Tangoe One Telecom
Lightyear.aiChanged
Two alternativesQuasa, Spenza
against: Calero, Tangoe One Telecom
Verint
Three alternativesCorio Networks, DGS Global, Telaris
Zoho Expense
Four alternativesCheetah Telecom, Excel, Expensify, Lightyear
against: Corcentric, GTCO
no first choiceagainst: Calero, Tangoe One Telecom
Kimi K2Calero
Three alternativesAsignet, Tellennium, vCom Solutions
against: Tangoe One Telecom
MindglobalChanged
Four alternativesCalero, GoExceed, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom
Tangoe One Telecom
Six alternativesBrightfin, Calero, Cass Information Systems, Sakon, Tellennium, Upland Cimpl
Genuity, Zoho Expense
Two alternativesCalero, Lightyear
no first choiceagainst: Calero, Genuity, Tangoe One Telecom
GLM 4.7 FlashXUpland Cimpl
Five alternativesCalero, Ginger Telecom, Lightyear, Stratix, Tangoe One Telecom
MindglobalChanged
Two alternativesBrightfin, vCom Solutions
Calero, Tangoe One Telecom
Five alternativesCimpl, Lightyear, OneBill, SpikeFli Analytics, vManager
Zoho Expense
Two alternativesExpenseLogic, SpikeFli Analytics
no first choiceagainst: Calero, Tangoe One Telecom
MiniMax M2.5no first choicevCom SolutionsChanged
Three alternativesCalero, DMI, Mindglobal
no first choiceGenuity
One alternativeZoho Expense
no first choicenothing named
GPT-6 LunaClearview
Two alternativesBrightfin, Genuity
against: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom
One Source’s Communications Lifecycle ManagementChanged
One alternativeValicom Clearview
Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom, Upland Cimpl
Four alternativesAsignet, Brightfin, Lightyear, vCom vManager
Genuity
One alternativevCom Solutions
no first choiceagainst: Asignet, Brightfin, Calero, Tangoe One Telecom
Muse Glimmer 30BLightyear
Four alternativesBrightfin, Calero, Mindglobal, vCom Solutions
against: Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom
vCom SolutionsChanged
Three alternativesCalero, Comview, ProfitLine
Tangoe – Tangoe One
Three alternativesCalero-MDSL – Calero, Sakon, Upland Software – Cimpl
Genuity
One alternativeLightyear
against: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom
no first choiceagainst: Brightfin, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom, Tangoe TEM
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 22:16yes99 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 22:34yes35 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 22:12yes1625 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 22:29yes143 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 23:20yes209 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 23:10yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 22:28yes2428 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 22:30yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 22:52yes919 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 23:08yes1829 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 23:15yes2278 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 22:15yes2127 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 22:32yes421 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-04 22:23yes2130 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 23:14yes1810 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 22:29yes45 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 23:05yes1724 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 23:13yes152 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 22:16yes2211 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 22:38yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 23:17yes2431 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 22:54yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 23:13yes942 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 22:41yes1719 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 22:29yes2434 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 23:20yes1023 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 23:01yes216 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-04 22:26yes1416 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 22:49yes1710 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 23:24yes69 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 23:14yes1523 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 22:28yes165 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 22:39yes229 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 23:23yes2210 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 22:54yes2237 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 23:20yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 22:51no029 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 22:24yes1622 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 22:19yes2269 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 22:32yes1530 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 22:53yes828 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-04 22:29yes1328 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 22:46yes149 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 23:23yes35 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 22:31yes1728 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 22:27yes173 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 23:26yes218 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 22:53yes85 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 22:23yes2222 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 23:13yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 22:53yes1019 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 23:08yes1945 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 22:22yes1938 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 23:03yes510 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 22:37yes213 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-04 22:54yes1925 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 23:24no05 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 22:30no012 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 23:19yes1924 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 22:15yes184 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 22:20yes1410 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 22:13no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 22:52yes1831 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 22:52yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 22:38no023 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 22:30yes2228 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 22:34yes1449 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 22:37yes512 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 22:48yes323 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-04 23:12yes1521 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 23:14yes2010 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 22:42yes47 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 23:19yes1623 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 23:18yes184 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 23:24yes2310 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 22:25yes54 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 22:54yes2131 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 22:21yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 22:24yes1536 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 23:24yes2527 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 23:15yes2359 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 22:32no08 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 23:14yes521 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-04 22:48yes2224 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Tangoe read as Tangoe One Telecom
Tangoe (Tangoe One) read as Tangoe One Telecom
Tangoe One read as Tangoe One Telecom
vCom read as vCom Solutions
vCom (vManager) read as vCom Solutions
Unresolved, counted raw
Amtel
AppDirect
Arcadia's Telecom Expense Management software and services
Calero MDS TEM
Calero-MDSL – Calero
Capterra
Cass Info Systems
Cbeyond
Cheetah Telecom
Corio Networks
DGS Global
GTCO
MDM Telecom
Mekorma TEM
MobilX
MobilityCentral by Visage Mobile
NetSpark IP & Telecom
One Source’s Communications Lifecycle Management (CLM)
OptiMax TEM
ProfitLine
Proven Optics
Quasa (Clearview)
RadiusPoint – ExpenseLogic
Soroco
Tangoe – Tangoe One
Temprix
Total Telecom Management by MCL Systems
Upland Software – Cimpl
Valicom's Clearview
Verint
Wavelink
WidePoint Corporation's Telecom Management solution
WinBill by TeleManagement Technologies
zLinq
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Supplier managementAccounts receivable auto →