Every category where a model named AuraVMS for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Supplier management	Spend and procurement	2%	15 of 80	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 26%
Procure-to-pay	Spend and procurement	0%	47 of 85	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 45%
Strategic sourcing	Spend and procurement	0%	47 of 127	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for AuraVMS yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated AuraVMS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase3 labels2

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained5 labels2

Scale-constrained2 labels1

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Starting at just $4.99/month, AuraVMS is incredibly budget-friendly.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Supplier management · budget prompt · first choice

“AuraVMS solves this while remaining highly cost-effective” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Strategic sourcing · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AuraVMS, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AuraVMS was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Tradogram11 of 143Not in the top three

SAP Ariba10 of 140Not in the top three

Coupa9 of 140Not in the top three

Precoro9 of 140Not in the top three

Procurify8 of 140Not in the top three

Market Dojo4 of 141Not in the top three

oboloo4 of 140Not in the top three

Ramp2 of 141Not in the top three

GEP SMART2 of 140Not in the top three

Ivalua2 of 140Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AuraVMS. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 14 answers that named AuraVMS and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

auravms.comYour site8

softwareadvice.com7

g2.com5

entproc.com4

softwareconnect.com4

spendflo.com4

tradogram.com4

capterra.com3

gartner.com3

getapp.com3

Thirty-seven of the forty-five domain citations in answers naming AuraVMS came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

softwareadvice.com/scm/strategic-sourcing-software-comparison4

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-strategic-sourcing-software4

auravms.com/blogs/best-e-sourcing-software-smb-procurement-20263

entproc.com/procurement-tools-for-smes3

ramp.com/blog/procurement-software-small-business3

tradogram.com/blog/12-best-purchasing-software-for-small-mid-size-companies3

auravms.com/blogs/precoro-vs-procurify-vs-tradogram-best-rfq-software-smb-20262

capterra.com/p/136077/Tradogram/pricing2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AuraVMS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AuraVMS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at auravms.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.