Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Lextree · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Lextree

17Judge labels

6First choices

0Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Lextree was named 5 times in Entity management, where Athennian led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business7 of 73

under the label threshold

Mid-market11 of 87

under the label threshold

Enterprise5 of 83

under the label threshold

In entity management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Lextree for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Entity management	Equity and corporate	3%	11 of 87	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Athennian at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Lextree yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Lextree across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	2	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labels5

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for Solo Admins & Dedicated Entity Tracking: Lextree ... Why it’s a top choice” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Entity management · budget prompt · first choice

“Commenda and Lextree offer good value with monthly costs around $99/month” MiniMax M2.5 · Entity management · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Lextree, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lextree was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

EntityKeeper11 of 171Not in the top three

CSC Entity Management9 of 171Not in the top three

Athennian8 of 170Not in the top three

Diligent Entities7 of 170Not in the top three

Diligent6 of 170Not in the top three

MinuteBox6 of 170Not in the top three

ContractZen5 of 173Not in the top three

Filejet5 of 171Not in the top three

Computershare GEMS4 of 170Not in the top three

CT Corporation Entity Management2 of 170Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lextree. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 17 answers that named Lextree and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

discern.com7

berkmansolutions.com6

getapp.com6

coverpin.com5

kurums.com5

softwareadvice.com5

blog.9cv9.com4

diliforce.com4

f6s.com4

g2.com4

Fifty of the fifty domain citations in answers naming Lextree came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

coverpin.com/resources/top-10-entity-management-tools-compared5

kurums.com/best-entity-management-software-2026-comparison5

blog.9cv9.com/top-10-entity-management-software-to-use-in-20264

diliforce.com/en/blog/top-softwares-for-smarter-entity-management-in-20264

f6s.com/software/category/legal-entity-management4

thelegalpractice.com/tools/best-legal-entity-management-software4

anywherer.com/best-corporate-entity-management-software3

berkmansolutions.com/software/entity-management3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lextree's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lextree, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at lextree.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.