Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Diliforce · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Diliforce

12Judge labels
5First choices
0Negative labels
7 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
11% in Entity management for small business buyers
Rank 26 of 87 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In entity management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Diliforce for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Entity managementEquity and corporate0%26 of 870%2under 10 labels · led by Athennian at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Diliforce yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Diliforce across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels2
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels3
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“best for SMBs, startups, and growing organizations, particularly legal and finance teams seeking an all-in-one, affordable solution” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Entity management · budget prompt · alternative
“A more affordable, all-in-one governance cloud platform suitable for SMBs, startups, and growing organizations” Mistral Small · Entity management · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Diliforce, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Diliforce was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
EntityKeeper7 of 122Not in the top three
Athennian7 of 120Not in the top three
Commenda5 of 122Not in the top three
MinuteBox5 of 122Not in the top three
CSC Entity Management5 of 120Not in the top three
Carta4 of 121Not in the top three
Diligent Entities4 of 120Not in the top three
ContractZen3 of 122Not in the top three
Pulley3 of 120Not in the top three
Filejet2 of 122Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Diliforce. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 12 answers that named Diliforce and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

diliforce.comYour site11
g2.com8
zipdo.co7
capterra.com6
f6s.com6
getapp.com6
techbullion.com6
commenda.io5
sourceforge.net5
worldmetrics.org5

Fifty-four of the sixty-five domain citations in answers naming Diliforce came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Diliforce's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Diliforce, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at diliforce.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack