Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Leasecake · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Leasecake

12Judge labels

1First choices

1Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Leasecake was named 7 times in Lease accounting, where FinQuery led with 36%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business11 of 64

under the label threshold

Mid-market18 of 60

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In lease accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Leasecake for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Lease accounting	Accounting and close	0%	18 of 60	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by FinQuery at 36%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Leasecake yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Leasecake across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labels1

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“offers an easy-to-use user interface that helps mid to large-sized companies navigate high data volumes fast” Llama 4 Maverick · Lease accounting · direct prompt · alternative

“Great if you are a multi-unit business (like retail, franchise, or restaurants) with a high volume of leases” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lease accounting · scale prompt · alternative

“Leasecake → best for franchise/multi‑unit operators with a simple, user‑friendly interface.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

“Leasecake: User-friendly UI for multi-unit ops.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Leasecake, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Leasecake was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

EZLease9 of 122Not in the top three

FinQuery8 of 125Not in the top three

Crunchafi8 of 120Not in the top three

Occupier7 of 120Not in the top three

Trullion6 of 120Not in the top three

Visual Lease6 of 120Not in the top three

MRI ProLease5 of 120Not in the top three

NetLease5 of 120Not in the top three

iLeasePro4 of 123Not in the top three

Black Owl Systems4 of 120Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Leasecake. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 12 answers that named Leasecake and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

softwareconnect.com10

occupier.com8

blackowlsystems.com7

capterra.com6

debtbook.com6

g2.com6

softwareadvice.com6

gartner.com5

impakter.com5

acquisition-international.com4

Sixty-three of the sixty-three domain citations in answers naming Leasecake came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-lease-accounting-software10

occupier.com/blog/best-lease-accounting-software8

blackowlsystems.com/best-lease-accounting-software-in-2026-compared7

capterra.com/lease-accounting-software6

debtbook.com/blog/best-lease-accounting-software6

softwareadvice.com/property/lease-accounting-comparison6

gartner.com/reviews/market/lease-accounting-and-management-software5

impakter.com/best-lease-accounting-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Leasecake's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Leasecake, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at leasecake.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.