Every category where a model named LegalX for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Entity management	Equity and corporate	3%	9 of 87	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Athennian at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LegalX yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LegalX across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	1	3
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels2

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative7 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained5 labels3

Scale-constrained2 labels1

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“LegalX – Best for legal ops teams needing traceable entity-level compliance tracking across hierarchies. Scores 9.3/10 for SMBs.” Mistral Small · Entity management · comparative prompt · first choice

“### 1. LegalX ... Best For: Teams needing compliance tracking without enterprise-level costs.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Entity management · budget prompt · first choice

“LegalX - a legal entity management software that offers entity-level compliance tracking” Llama 4 Maverick · Entity management · budget prompt · alternative

“Highly ranked for legal ops teams needing traceable, entity-level compliance tracking” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Entity management · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LegalX, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LegalX was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

EntityKeeper12 of 215Not in the top three

Diligent Entities12 of 211Not in the top three

Athennian10 of 211Not in the top three

Carta9 of 211Not in the top three

CT Corporation Entity Management7 of 210Not in the top three

CSC Entity Management6 of 210Not in the top three

Legalboards6 of 210Not in the top three

MinuteBox5 of 211Not in the top three

Corporify5 of 210Not in the top three

DiliTrust Governance Suite4 of 210Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LegalX. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named LegalX and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org21

f6s.com11

capterra.com9

coverpin.com8

getapp.com8

gitnux.org8

zipdo.co8

thelegalpractice.com7

g2.com6

anywherer.com5

Ninety-one of the ninety-one domain citations in answers naming LegalX came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

worldmetrics.org/best/entity-management-software21

worldmetrics.org/best/entity-software12

f6s.com/software/category/legal-entity-management11

worldmetrics.org/best/legal-entity-management-software11

coverpin.com/resources/top-10-entity-management-tools-compared8

capterra.com/entity-management-software7

thelegalpractice.com/tools/best-legal-entity-management-software7

getapp.com/operations-management-software/entity-management6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LegalX's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LegalX, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at legalxindia.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.