Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › myBiz · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

myBiz

14Judge labels

2First choices

1Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. myBiz was named 6 times in Corporate travel managem, where Navan led with 51%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business6 of 41

under the label threshold

Mid-market15 of 60

under the label threshold

Enterprise29 of 35

under the label threshold

In corporate travel managem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named myBiz for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate travel management	Spend and procurement	0%	15 of 60	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Navan at 51%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for myBiz yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated myBiz across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase2 labels1

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 label1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as myBiz, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and myBiz was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Navan12 of 144Not in the top three

TravelPerk11 of 141Not in the top three

Brex11 of 140Not in the top three

Ramp10 of 140Not in the top three

SAP Concur8 of 140Not in the top three

Amex GBT Egencia5 of 140Not in the top three

BCD Travel4 of 140Not in the top three

Booking.com for Business4 of 140Not in the top three

American Express Global Business Travel3 of 140Not in the top three

Coupa3 of 140Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named myBiz. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named myBiz and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com13

rippling.com8

perk.com7

ottotheagent.com6

bill.com5

businesstravel.com5

g2.com5

gartner.com5

navan.com5

brex.com4

Sixty-three of the sixty-three domain citations in answers naming myBiz came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-travel-management-software13

rippling.com/blog/small-business-travel-management-software8

bill.com/blog/best-travel-and-expense-management-software5

businesstravel.com/blog/best-business-travel-management-software-for-small-and-mid-sized-b5

gartner.com/reviews/market/corporate-travel-management-software5

oncehub.com/blog/top-travel-management-software4

perk.com/blog/best-travel-management-software-small-business4

ramp.com/blog/travel-management-tools4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as myBiz

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as myBiz; a claim can dispute any of them.

myBiz by MakeMyTrip 6

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when myBiz's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as myBiz, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mybiznerd.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.