Every category where a model named CWT for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate travel management	Spend and procurement	0%	22 of 60	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by Navan at 51%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CWT yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CWT across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative28 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Egencia / Amex GBT / CWT / BCD / FCM if you want a managed travel service model.” GPT-5.4 mini · Corporate travel managem · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Unlike enterprise tools (e.g., Concur, CWT), these avoid heavy customization/setup.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate travel managem · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CWT, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CWT was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Navan25 of 2810Not in the top three

SAP Concur24 of 287Not in the top three

BCD Travel20 of 282Not in the top three

American Express Global Business Travel19 of 285Not in the top three

TravelPerk18 of 282Not in the top three

Amex GBT Egencia12 of 280Not in the top three

Ramp10 of 281Not in the top three

Brex8 of 280Not in the top three

Spotnana7 of 280Not in the top three

Corporate Travel Management4 of 280Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CWT. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 28 answers that named CWT and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

routespring.com18

ottotheagent.com17

gartner.com16

navan.com16

engine.com13

learn.g2.com13

worldmetrics.org11

g2.com10

itilite.com10

modernbusinesstravel.com10

134 of the 134 domain citations in answers naming CWT came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/corporate-travel-management-software16

learn.g2.com/best-travel-management-software13

modernbusinesstravel.com/corporate/best-corporate-travel-management-platforms-202610

oncehub.com/blog/top-travel-management-software9

routespring.com/best-corporate-travel-programs-compared-2026-buyers-guide8

engine.com/blog/corporate-travel-booking-platforms7

itilite.com/blog/top-10-travel-management-company-us7

navan.com/blog/amex-gbt-alternatives7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as CWT

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CWT; a claim can dispute any of them.

CWT (Carlson Wagonlit Travel) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CWT's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CWT, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mycwt.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.