Every category where a model named Rippling Travel for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate travel management	Spend and procurement	0%	18 of 60	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Navan at 51%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Rippling Travel yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Rippling Travel across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels1

Paraphrase6 labels1

Comparative7 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labels1

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Companies wanting unified HR, travel, expense, and corporate cards” Kimi K2 · Corporate travel managem · direct prompt · alternative

“Ideal if you want your travel policies automatically tied to your HRIS” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Corporate travel managem · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Rippling Travel, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Rippling Travel was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TravelPerk21 of 248Not in the top three

Navan20 of 247Not in the top three

Booking.com for Business15 of 245Not in the top three

Brex11 of 240Not in the top three

SAP Concur11 of 240Not in the top three

Ramp10 of 241Not in the top three

Amex GBT Egencia6 of 240Not in the top three

TravelBank4 of 241Not in the top three

Expensify Travel4 of 240Not in the top three

Engine3 of 241Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Rippling Travel. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 24 answers that named Rippling Travel and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

rippling.comYour site21

perk.com15

ottotheagent.com14

businesstravel.com13

learn.g2.com11

brex.com9

navan.com9

g2.com8

business.booking.com7

routespring.com7

Ninety-three of the 114 domain citations in answers naming Rippling Travel came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

rippling.com/blog/small-business-travel-management-software21

businesstravel.com/blog/best-business-travel-management-software-for-small-and-mid-sized-b13

learn.g2.com/best-travel-management-software11

perk.com/blog/best-travel-management-software-small-business11

brex.com/spend-trends/corporate-travel-management/best-business-travel-management-software8

gartner.com/reviews/market/corporate-travel-management-software6

navan.com/blog/the-7-best-b2b-travel-solutions-for-corporate-efficiency6

oncehub.com/blog/top-travel-management-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Rippling Travel

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Rippling Travel; a claim can dispute any of them.

Rippling Travel & Expense 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rippling Travel's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rippling Travel, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at rippling.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.