Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Routespring · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Routespring

17Judge labels

2First choices

0Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

9 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Routespring was named 9 times in Corporate travel managem and 1 other category, where Navan led with 51%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business18 of 41

under the label threshold

Mid-market6 of 60

under the label threshold

Enterprise11 of 35

under the label threshold

In corporate travel managem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Routespring for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate travel management	Spend and procurement	4%	6 of 60	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Navan at 51%
Expense management	Spend and procurement	0%	32 of 46	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Routespring yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Routespring across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labels1

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you want completely free: Routespring or Engine” MiniMax M2.5 · Corporate travel managem · budget prompt · first choice

“For a mid-sized B2B company, I'd lean toward Routespring” MiniMax M2.5 · Corporate travel managem · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Routespring is described as suitable for small to mid-market companies” GPT-5.4 mini · Corporate travel managem · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Routespring, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Routespring was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SAP Concur12 of 172Not in the top three

Navan11 of 174Not in the top three

TravelPerk9 of 172Not in the top three

Amex GBT Egencia4 of 170Not in the top three

Ramp4 of 170Not in the top three

Booking.com for Business2 of 171Not in the top three

Spendesk2 of 171Not in the top three

AmTrav2 of 170Not in the top three

American Express Global Business Travel2 of 170Not in the top three

Brex2 of 170Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Routespring. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named Routespring and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com12

ottotheagent.com9

routespring.comYour site8

learn.g2.com7

navan.com7

brex.com4

expensevisor.com4

perk.com4

pickmysoft.com4

travel-code.com4

Fifty-five of the sixty-three domain citations in answers naming Routespring came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/corporate-travel-management-software10

learn.g2.com/best-travel-management-software5

ottotheagent.com/blog/best-corporate-travel-management-software5

brex.com/spend-trends/corporate-travel-management/best-business-travel-management-software4

expensevisor.com/5-excellent-business-travel-management-tools-for-20244

ottotheagent.com/blog/corporate-travel-management-software-mid-market4

pickmysoft.com/blog/best-corporate-travel-booking-software4

business.booking.com/en-us/business-travel-resources/blog/the-best-business-travel-managem3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Routespring's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Routespring, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at routespring.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.