Every category where a model named Wolters Kluwer Legisway for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Entity management	Equity and corporate	0%	64 of 87	29%	7	under 10 labels · led by Athennian at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Wolters Kluwer Legisway yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Wolters Kluwer Legisway across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative10 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Legisway is a "document-heavy" platform.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Entity management · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid: Enterprise solutions like Wolters Kluwer Legisway or Diligent Boardroom” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Entity management · budget prompt · hard negative

“"less entity depth than specialists" and a "broad scope [that] adds a steep learning curve."” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Entity management · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Wolters Kluwer Legisway, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wolters Kluwer Legisway was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Diligent Entities19 of 224Not in the top three

Athennian17 of 225Not in the top three

EntityKeeper13 of 221Not in the top three

CSC Entity Management11 of 221Not in the top three

Computershare GEMS11 of 220Not in the top three

DiliTrust Governance Suite9 of 220Not in the top three

Corporify8 of 220Not in the top three

Filejet7 of 220Not in the top three

MinuteBox7 of 220Not in the top three

EnGlobe4 of 221Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wolters Kluwer Legisway. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 22 answers that named Wolters Kluwer Legisway and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org15

coverpin.com14

getapp.com13

blog.9cv9.com10

techbullion.com10

capterra.com8

f6s.com8

gitnux.org8

wifitalents.com8

diligent.com7

101 of the 101 domain citations in answers naming Wolters Kluwer Legisway came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

coverpin.com/resources/top-10-entity-management-tools-compared14

worldmetrics.org/best/entity-management-software12

blog.9cv9.com/top-10-entity-management-software-to-use-in-202610

techbullion.com/the-6-best-entity-management-tools-in-202610

getapp.com/operations-management-software/entity-management9

capterra.com/entity-management-software8

f6s.com/software/category/legal-entity-management8

worldmetrics.org/best/entity-software8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Wolters Kluwer Legisway

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Wolters Kluwer Legisway; a claim can dispute any of them.

Legisway 4DiliTrust/Legisway 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wolters Kluwer Legisway's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wolters Kluwer Legisway, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at wolterskluwer.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.