Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Spotnana · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Spotnana

27Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Corporate travel managem for mid-market buyers
Rank 11 of 60 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 10% of its 10 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In corporate travel managem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Spotnana for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Corporate travel managementSpend and procurement0%11 of 6010%10accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Spotnana yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Spotnana across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01203
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01113
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Spotnana's AI-driven platform is ideal, but be prepared to negotiate custom pricing through partners.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Corporate travel managem · direct prompt · alternative
“Spotnana is ideal for companies needing advanced customization and modern tech integration.” Mistral Small · Corporate travel managem · direct prompt · alternative
“API-first platform rated 9.2/10, excellent for policy enforcement and approval traceability” Kimi K2 · Corporate travel managem · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Choose Spotnana if you want a highly customizable, API-first platform” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate travel managem · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Users report "constant errors requiring me to chat or call in to make reservations" and recent 1-star reviews.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Spotnana, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Spotnana was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Navan26 of 2714Not in the top three
SAP Concur24 of 274Not in the top three
TravelPerk21 of 273Not in the top three
American Express Global Business Travel14 of 273Not in the top three
Amex GBT Egencia13 of 270Not in the top three
BCD Travel11 of 270Not in the top three
Ramp10 of 271Not in the top three
CWT7 of 270Not in the top three
Brex6 of 271Not in the top three
ITILITE4 of 270Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Spotnana. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 27 answers that named Spotnana and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com15
navan.com15
ottotheagent.com15
modernbusinesstravel.com13
worldmetrics.org12
routespring.com11
learn.g2.com10
engine.com8
g2.com8
pickmysoft.com8

115 of the 115 domain citations in answers naming Spotnana came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Spotnana's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Spotnana, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at spotnana.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack