Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Deem · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Deem

8Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Deem was named 5 times in Corporate travel managem, where Navan led with 51%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market14 of 60

under the label threshold

Enterprise14 of 35

under the label threshold

In corporate travel managem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Deem for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate travel management	Spend and procurement	0%	14 of 60	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Navan at 51%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Deem yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Deem across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Mid-market and enterprise policy enforcement” Kimi K2 · Corporate travel managem · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Deem, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Deem was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Navan8 of 84Not in the top three

SAP Concur7 of 80Not in the top three

TravelPerk5 of 81Not in the top three

Coupa5 of 80Not in the top three

American Express Global Business Travel4 of 80Not in the top three

Ramp4 of 80Not in the top three

Amex GBT Egencia3 of 80Not in the top three

Brex3 of 80Not in the top three

ITILITE3 of 80Not in the top three

myBiz3 of 80Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Deem. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named Deem and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com7

worldmetrics.org7

gartner.com6

navan.com5

bill.com3

engine.com3

rippling.com3

expensevisor.com2

itilite.com2

modernbusinesstravel.com2

Forty of the forty domain citations in answers naming Deem came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-travel-management-software7

gartner.com/reviews/market/corporate-travel-management-software6

worldmetrics.org/best/travel-management-software6

bill.com/blog/best-travel-and-expense-management-software3

rippling.com/blog/small-business-travel-management-software3

expensevisor.com/5-excellent-business-travel-management-tools-for-20242

modernbusinesstravel.com/corporate/best-corporate-travel-management-platforms-20262

ramp.com/blog/travel-management-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Deem's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Deem, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at deem.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.