Every category where a model named ITILITE for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate travel management	Spend and procurement	2%	7 of 60	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by Navan at 51%
Expense management	Spend and procurement	0%	37 of 46	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ITILITE yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ITILITE across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels1

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“ITILITE - Best Overall for Mid-Market” MiniMax M2.5 · Corporate travel managem · direct prompt · first choice

“ITILITE's per-trip model and 24/7 support make it a compelling option for mid-market firms.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Corporate travel managem · direct prompt · alternative

“🥈 ITILITE (Best for travel + expense + cards in one unified platform)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate travel managem · direct prompt · alternative

“Purpose-built for mid-market companies with integrated expense management” Kimi K2 · Corporate travel managem · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ITILITE, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ITILITE was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Navan13 of 166Not in the top three

TravelPerk12 of 162Not in the top three

SAP Concur12 of 161Not in the top three

Ramp9 of 162Not in the top three

Brex7 of 161Not in the top three

American Express Global Business Travel4 of 160Not in the top three

Spotnana4 of 160Not in the top three

Amex GBT Egencia3 of 160Not in the top three

BCD Travel3 of 160Not in the top three

Coupa3 of 160Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ITILITE. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 16 answers that named ITILITE and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com13

ottotheagent.com11

itilite.comYour site9

learn.g2.com8

brex.com7

perk.com7

worldmetrics.org7

travelboost.app6

navan.com5

pickmysoft.com5

Sixty-nine of the seventy-eight domain citations in answers naming ITILITE came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/corporate-travel-management-software11

learn.g2.com/best-travel-management-software7

ottotheagent.com/blog/corporate-travel-management-software-mid-market6

travelboost.app/blog/company-travel-management-software6

perk.com/blog/best-corporate-travel-booking-websites5

pickmysoft.com/blog/best-corporate-travel-booking-software5

ramp.com/blog/travel-management-tools5

brex.com/spend-trends/corporate-travel-management/best-business-travel-management-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ITILITE

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ITILITE; a claim can dispute any of them.

Itilite 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ITILITE's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ITILITE, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at itilite.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.