Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Expedia for Business · September 2026 Edition

Expedia · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Expedia for Business

12Judge labels

0First choices

8Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Expedia for Business was named 4 times in Corporate travel managem, where Navan led with 51%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business38 of 41

under the label threshold

Mid-market59 of 60

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In corporate travel managem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Expedia for Business for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate travel management	Spend and procurement	0%	59 of 60	75%	4	under 10 labels · led by Navan at 51%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Expedia for Business yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Expedia for Business across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Consumer-Facing OTAs for Business (e.g., Expedia Business, Booking.com) Avoid If: Your priority is Duty of Care, compliance, or integrated expenses.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · hard negative

“Online Travel Agencies (OTAs) like Expedia, Booking.com, Travelocity, and similar sites - Why avoid?” Mistral Small · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · hard negative

“While a major platform, has significant complaints about: Unhelpful and unresponsive customer service” Kimi K2 · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Expedia for Business, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Expedia for Business was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TravelPerk9 of 123Not in the top three

Navan8 of 123Not in the top three

Booking.com for Business8 of 121Not in the top three

SAP Concur7 of 121Not in the top three

American Express Global Business Travel5 of 120Not in the top three

KAYAK for Business4 of 120Not in the top three

Ramp3 of 121Not in the top three

Otto the Agent3 of 120Not in the top three

BCD Travel2 of 120Not in the top three

CWT2 of 120Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Expedia for Business. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 12 answers that named Expedia for Business and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ottotheagent.com7

rippling.com6

businesstravel.com5

g2.com5

learn.g2.com4

oncehub.com4

routespring.com4

myhospitalnow.com3

navan.com3

perk.com3

Forty-four of the forty-four domain citations in answers naming Expedia for Business came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

rippling.com/blog/small-business-travel-management-software6

businesstravel.com/blog/best-business-travel-management-software-for-small-and-mid-sized-b5

learn.g2.com/best-travel-management-software4

oncehub.com/blog/top-travel-management-software4

g2.com/categories/travel-management3

g2.com/categories/travel-management/small-business3

g2.com/discussions/best-travel-management-software-for-small-business2

myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-travel-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Expedia for Business

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Expedia for Business; a claim can dispute any of them.

Expedia 2Expedia Business 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Expedia for Business's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Expedia for Business, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at expedia.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.