Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Otto the Agent · September 2026 Edition
Otto · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Otto the Agent

7Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
5 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Otto the Agent was named 1 time in Corporate travel managem, where Navan led with 51%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In corporate travel managem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Otto the Agent for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Corporate travel managementSpend and procurement0%28 of 600%1under 10 labels · led by Navan at 51%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Otto the Agent yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Otto the Agent across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Otto the Agent, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Otto the Agent was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
TravelPerk7 of 72Not in the top three
SAP Concur7 of 70Not in the top three
Navan6 of 73Not in the top three
Booking.com for Business3 of 71Not in the top three
Ramp3 of 71Not in the top three
Expedia for Business3 of 70Not in the top three
Amex GBT Egencia2 of 70Not in the top three
Engine2 of 70Not in the top three
Expensify Travel2 of 70Not in the top three
Brex1 of 71Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Otto the Agent. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 7 answers that named Otto the Agent and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as Otto the Agent

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Otto the Agent; a claim can dispute any of them.
Otto 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Otto the Agent's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Otto the Agent, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ottotheagent.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack