Financial reporting and dashboards
Asked as “financial reporting software”, and as “finance dashboard tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
33%
Contested · Wave 17%
33Sage Intacct17Wave09Zoho Books41others
33% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▲+9Since September 2026: 27% → 36%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Sage Intacct held the lead, +9 points on 27%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
QuickBooks Online26%Contested▼−11Since September 2026: 38% → 27%, −11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Sage Intacct33%Contested▲+9Since September 2026: 27% → 36%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterpriseMicrosoft Power BI22%Contested▼−1Since September 2026: 19% → 18%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
QuickBooks Online26%Contested▼−11Since September 2026: 38% → 27%, −11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketSage Intacct33%Contested▲+9Since September 2026: 27% → 36%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterpriseMicrosoft Power BI22%Contested▼−1Since September 2026: 19% → 18%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Sage Intacct33%0%21endorsed leader▲+9Since September 2026: 27% → 36%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.27% → 36%
Sage Intacct33%0%21endorsed leader▲+9Since September 2026: 27% → 36%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.27% → 36%02
Wave17%0%13accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 12% → 17%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 17%
Wave17%0%13accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 12% → 17%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 17%03
Zoho Books9%0%12accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 6%
Zoho Books9%0%12accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 6%04Microsoft Power BI7%12%33accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 4%
05
Datarails4%0%20accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%
Datarails4%0%20accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%06
Zoho Analytics4%0%16accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
Zoho Analytics4%0%16accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%07
Tableau4%24%29accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
Tableau4%24%29accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%08
Vena2%0%21accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 2%
Vena2%0%21accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 2%09QuickBooks Online2%15%26accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
QuickBooks Online2%15%26accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%10
Oracle NetSuite2%14%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Oracle NetSuite2%14%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%11
Xero2%7%14accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Xero2%7%14accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
18
Domo0%30%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Domo0%30%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%16
Looker Studio Lab in the set0%20%15accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Looker Studio Lab in the set0%20%15accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%17
Qlik Sense0%20%15accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Qlik Sense0%20%15accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%15
Cube0%9%11accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Cube0%9%11accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%12
Looker Lab in the set0%6%17accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Looker Lab in the set0%6%17accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%13
Planful0%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Planful0%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%14
Prophix0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Prophix0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Looker is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Looker Studio is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Sage Intacct vs DatarailsSage Intacct vs Zoho AnalyticsSage Intacct vs TableauSage Intacct vs VenaWave vs Zoho BooksWave vs Microsoft Power BIWave vs DatarailsWave vs Zoho AnalyticsWave vs TableauWave vs VenaZoho Books vs Microsoft Power BIZoho Books vs DatarailsZoho Books vs Zoho AnalyticsZoho Books vs TableauZoho Books vs VenaMicrosoft Power BI vs DatarailsMicrosoft Power BI vs Zoho AnalyticsMicrosoft Power BI vs TableauMicrosoft Power BI vs VenaDatarails vs Zoho AnalyticsDatarails vs TableauDatarails vs VenaZoho Analytics vs TableauZoho Analytics vs VenaTableau vs Vena
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203M04
0506070809101112131415161718Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Sage Intacct33%
Sage Intacct33%02Wave17%
Wave17%03Zoho Books9%
Zoho Books9%04Microsoft Power BI7%
05Datarails4%
Datarails4%06Zoho Analytics4%
Zoho Analytics4%07Tableau4%
Tableau4%08Vena2%
Vena2%09QuickBooks Online2%
QuickBooks Online2%10Oracle NetSuite2%
Oracle NetSuite2%11Xero2%
Xero2%12Looker0%
Looker0%13Planful0%
Planful0%14Prophix0%
Prophix0%15Cube0%
Cube0%16Looker Studio0%
Looker Studio0%17Qlik Sense0%
Qlik Sense0%18Domo0%
Domo0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Tableau24%
7 of 29 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“Some users report declining quality post-Salesforce acquisition, support issues, confusing billing practices” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
SAP Crystal Reports75%
6 of 8 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Crystal Reports 2020's mainstream maintenance ended December 31, 2025... If you're using an older version, you're on borrowed time.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
SAP BusinessObjects100%
4 of 4 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“heavyweight enterprise legacy tools are increasingly entering "maintenance mode" or being sunsetted” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
IBM Cognos Analytics100%
3 of 3 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Modern organizations are rapidly migrating away from these platforms to avoid massive technical debt.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
68 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 900 links across 342 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 8 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Ramp26 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Drivetrain20 answers · 29 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Productive17 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Basedash14 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
vendor site · G212 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
vendor site · HighRadius12 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Worldmetrics11 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
11 answers · 12 citations · 6 models
vendor site · FreshBooks11 answers · 11 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Guideflow10 answers · 10 citations · 8 models
10 answers · 10 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Improvado9 answers · 9 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
24 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 8 models
8 answers · 6 models
8 answers · 8 models
8 answers · 4 models
8 answers · 6 models
6 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best financial reporting software”, “financial reporting software”, “reporting tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sage sage.com Sage Intacct 33% | 33% | 433 | 246,000 | 90,599 | 1,737,127 company | $114,671 | 78 |
| Wave waveapps.com | 17% | 323 | 368,000 | 253,218 | 708,862 | 39 | |
| Zoho zoho.com Zoho Books 9% | 9% | 326 | 27,100 | 268 | 1,216,894 company | $51,031 | 119 |
| Microsoft Power BI | 7% | 14,800 | 515 | ||||
| Datarails datarails.com | 4% | 303 | 6,600 | 134 | 18,964 | $16,697 | 107 |
| Zoho parent site Zoho Analytics 4% | 4% | 42 | 2,900 | 23 | |||
| Tableau tableau.com | 4% | 138 | 135,000 | 15,635 | 1,201,809 | $23 | 85 |
| Abacum abacum.ai | 4% | 73 | 1,300 | 18 | 79,014 | $26 | 16 |
| Vena venasolutions.com | 2% | 344 | 12,100 | 3,928 | 62,294 | $13,792 | 58 |
| QuickBooks quickbooks.ninja QuickBooks Online 2% | 2% | 621 | 1,000,000 | 54,681 | 253 company |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (highradius.com, productive.io, ramp.com, technologyadvice.com). The first result for “best financial reporting software” is thecfoclub.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best financial reporting software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which finance dashboard tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top reporting tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best financial reporting software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a financial reporting software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which reporting tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Sage IntacctMicrosoft Power BI, TableauChangedMicrosoft Power BIWaveno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Flow ERP, Oracle NetSuite, ProphixSeven alternatives
AgencyAnalytics, Domo, Looker, Looker Studio, Qlik Sense, Tableau, Zoho AnalyticsThree alternatives
QuickBooks Online, Xero, Zoho BooksGPT-5.4 miniSage IntacctAbacumChangedMicrosoft Power BIQuickBooks Online, Waveagainst: Syft Analytics, Velixono first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
OneStream, Prophix, Solver, WorkivaFour alternatives
Board, Phocas Software, Planful, VenaThree alternatives
Looker, Tableau, Zoho AnalyticsOne alternative
XeroGemini 3.5 FlashSage Intacctagainst: QuickBooks Online, XeroMosaicChangedMicrosoft Power BISyft Analyticsagainst: Cube, Jirav, QuickBooks Onlineno first choiceagainst: Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: Domo, IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker, Microsoft SSRS, NetSuite analytics, SAP BusinessObjects, SAP Crystal Reports, Salesforce reports, Sisense, Tableau
Seven alternatives
Datarails, Intuit Enterprise Suite, Oracle NetSuite, Pigment, Planful, Prophix, VenaFour alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Fathom, PlanfulSeven alternatives
Domo, Looker, Looker Studio, Qlik Sense, Sigma Computing, Tableau, ThoughtSpotFour alternatives
Fathom, Google Sheets, Wave, Zoho BooksFive alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Mosaic, Planful, VenaPerplexity SonarSage IntacctDatarailsChangedQuickBooks Onlineagainst: SAP Crystal ReportsWaveno first choiceagainst: Databox, Funnel, Looker Studio, Whatagraph
Four alternatives
Datarails, Planful, Prophix, VenaFour alternatives
Prophix, Sigma Computing, Tableau, Zoho AnalyticsThree alternatives
Looker, Microsoft Power BI, TableauTwo alternatives
QuickBooks Online, Zoho BooksGrok 4.1 FastSage Intacctagainst: Anaplan, Oracle NetSuite, Oracle PBCS, QuickBooks OnlineFathomChangedagainst: Microsoft Power BI, TableauMicrosoft Power BI, TableauWaveSage Intacctagainst: Domo, IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker Studio, MicroStrategy, Microsoft Power BI, Octoboard, Oracle, Qlik Sense, SAP, SAP BusinessObjects, SAP Crystal Reports, Tableau, Whatagraph
Two alternatives
Datarails, VenaThree alternatives
Datarails, Jirav, MosaicSix alternatives
Looker, Looker Studio, Oracle Analytics, Qlik Sense, ThoughtSpot, Zoho AnalyticsThree alternatives
GnuCash, Xero, Zoho BooksThree alternatives
Datarails, Oracle NetSuite, VenaMistral SmallSage IntacctSage Intacct, Zoho AnalyticsChangedno first choiceFreshBooksno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Datarails, HighRadius, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Basedash, Metabase, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningSeven alternatives
Looker, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, Qlik Sense, Tableau, ThoughtSpot, Zoho AnalyticsFour alternatives
Patriot Software, QuickBooks Online, Xero, ZipBooksDeepSeek V4 FlashSage IntacctDrivetrainChangedno first choiceagainst: DomoWaveOracle NetSuite, Sage Intacctagainst: Workday Financialsagainst: Qlik Sense, SAP Crystal Reports, SQL Server Reporting Services
Two alternatives
Datarails, Oracle NetSuiteFour alternatives
Cube, Fathom, Planful, VenaFour alternatives
FreshBooks, QuickBooks Online, Xero, Zoho BooksOne alternative
Microsoft Dynamics 365Llama 4 MaverickSage IntacctZoho AnalyticsChangedno first choiceProductiveno first choiceagainst: Improvado, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, Qlik Sense, Tableau
Four alternatives
Datarails, Maxio, Phocas Software, VenaThree alternatives
Basedash, Metabase, Microsoft Power BIFour alternatives
Datarails, Fathom, Sage Intacct, Zoho BooksQwen 3.7 FlashSage IntacctVenaChangedagainst: Anaplan, OracleMicrosoft Power BIagainst: SAP Crystal ReportsXerono first choiceagainst: MicroStrategy, Microsoft Excel, SAP BusinessObjects, SAP Crystal Reports, Tableau
Four alternatives
BlackLine, OneStream, Oracle NetSuite, VenaThree alternatives
Datarails, Pigment, PulseThree alternatives
Looker, Looker Studio, TableauFour alternatives
Microsoft Power BI, QuickBooks Online, Wave, Zoho BooksKimi K2Sage Intacctagainst: Oracle NetSuiteSage IntacctHeldLooker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, TableauWave, Zoho BooksSage Intacctagainst: Microsoft Power BI, Tableau
Two alternatives
Cube, DatarailsThree alternatives
Cube, Microsoft Power BI, Oracle NetSuiteTwo alternatives
Metabase, Zoho AnalyticsOne alternative
FreshBooksFive alternatives
Anaplan, Datarails, Oracle NetSuite, Planful, VenaGLM 4.7 FlashXSage Intacctagainst: OneStreamAbacumChangedno first choiceWave, Zoho Booksno first choiceagainst: Google Analytics, IBM Cognos Analytics, Microsoft Excel, SAP BusinessObjects, SQL Server Reporting Services
Four alternatives
Acumatica, Datarails, Oracle NetSuite, VenaFive alternatives
Databox, Microsoft Power BI, Planful, Prophix, SisenseFour alternatives
FreshBooks, GnuCash, Odoo, QuickBooks OnlineMiniMax M2.5Sage IntacctMicrosoft Power BI, TableauChangedno first choiceWave, Zoho Booksno first choiceagainst: Tableau
Four alternatives
Acumatica, Mosaic, Oracle NetSuite, VenaTwo alternatives
Cube, MosaicGPT-6 LunaDatarailsMicrosoft Power BIChangedno first choiceZoho Booksagainst: QuickBooks Onlineno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Planful, Sage Intacct, Workday Adaptive PlanningOne alternative
CubeSeven alternatives
Looker, Looker Studio, Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, Qlik Sense, Sigma Computing, TableauOne alternative
WaveMuse Glimmer 30BSage IntacctMicrosoft Power BIChangedMicrosoft Power BIWave, Zoho Booksno first choiceagainst: Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel
Three alternatives
Datarails, Prophix, VenaTwo alternatives
Cube, Spotlight ReportingThree alternatives
Looker, Looker Studio, TableauOne alternative
QuickBooks OnlineBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:12 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:53 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 19 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 19 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:13 | yes | 22 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:05 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:19 | yes | 19 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:53 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:38 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:00 | yes | 18 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:36 | yes | 7 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:15 | yes | 4 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:47 | yes | 12 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:19 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:30 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:58 | yes | 17 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:00 | yes | 19 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:20 | yes | 24 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:59 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:14 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:09 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:51 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 14 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 22 | 51 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:50 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:16 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:48 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 3 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:43 | yes | 19 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:04 | yes | 18 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:31 | yes | 22 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:29 | yes | 10 | 11 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 23 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:16 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:42 | yes | 10 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:38 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:05 | yes | 15 | 61 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:11 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:49 | yes | 7 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:06 | yes | 13 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:52 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:38 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:21 | yes | 21 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:20 | yes | 25 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:05 | yes | 20 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:40 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:46 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:10 | yes | 10 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:21 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:50 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:04 | yes | 3 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:53 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:57 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:11 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:01 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:19 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:08 | yes | 14 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:23 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:04 | yes | 19 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:00 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:43 | no | 0 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:00 | yes | 15 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 8 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:43 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:16 | yes | 3 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:49 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:50 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:35 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:40 | yes | 24 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:40 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 25 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:53 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:11 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:32 | no | 0 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:17 | yes | 25 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 23 | 45 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:05 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:48 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 23 | 36 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adaptive Insights read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
Google Looker Studio read as Looker Studio
IBM Cognos read as IBM Cognos Analytics
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
Prophix One read as Prophix
Qlik read as Qlik Sense
Qlik (Sense/View) read as Qlik Sense
Qlik Cloud Analytics / Qlik Sense read as Qlik Sense
QuickBooks read as QuickBooks Online
QuickBooks Free read as QuickBooks Online
QuickBooks Online Simple Start read as QuickBooks Online
QuickBooks Solopreneur read as QuickBooks Online
Sigma read as Sigma Computing
Vena Solutions read as Vena
Wave Accounting read as Wave
Unresolved, counted raw
Dundas
NetSuite analytics
Octoboard
Pentaho Business Intelligence
Plotly Dash Enterprise
Salesforce reports
SyncWith
Velixo
Wavel
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.