Corporate performance management
Asked as “EPM software”, and as “corporate performance management platform”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 60 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
22%
Contested · Prophix 17%
22Planful17Prophix15Vena47others
22% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▼−7Since September 2026: 29% → 21%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Planful held the lead, −7 points on 29%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Cube15%Contested▼−1Since September 2026: 16% → 15%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Planful22%Contested▼−7Since September 2026: 29% → 21%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterprise
Anaplan30%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Anaplan (28%) replaces OneStream (30% then, 17% now), 11 points clear, past the 10-point floor.Standing →
Cube15%Contested▼−1Since September 2026: 16% → 15%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketPlanful22%Contested▼−7Since September 2026: 29% → 21%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterpriseAnaplan30%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Anaplan (28%) replaces OneStream (30% then, 17% now), 11 points clear, past the 10-point floor.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Planful22%2%41accepted challenger▼−7Since September 2026: 29% → 21%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.29% → 21%
Planful22%2%41accepted challenger▼−7Since September 2026: 29% → 21%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.29% → 21%02
Prophix17%3%39accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 12% → 17%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 17%
Prophix17%3%39accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 12% → 17%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 17%03
Vena15%14%42accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 12% → 15%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 15%
Vena15%14%42accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 12% → 15%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 15%04
Workday Adaptive Planning10%29%52criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 12% → 10%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 10%
Workday Adaptive Planning10%29%52criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 12% → 10%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 10%05Cube8%5%21accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 5% → 10%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 10%
Cube8%5%21accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 5% → 10%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 10%06
Datarails7%26%19criticized challenger▲+8Since September 2026: 0% → 8%, +8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 8%
Datarails7%26%19criticized challenger▲+8Since September 2026: 0% → 8%, +8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 8%07
Jedox2%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Jedox2%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%08
Pigment2%0%11accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 2%
Pigment2%0%11accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 2%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
Oracle Hyperion0%90%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Oracle Hyperion0%90%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%14Anaplan0%55%49criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Anaplan0%55%49criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%12
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM0%53%47criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM0%53%47criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11
OneStream0%45%42criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
OneStream0%45%42criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%09
SAP Analytics Cloud0%15%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
SAP Analytics Cloud0%15%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%10
IBM Planning Analytics0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
IBM Planning Analytics0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Planful vs CubePlanful vs DatarailsPlanful vs JedoxPlanful vs PigmentProphix vs VenaProphix vs Workday Adaptive PlanningProphix vs CubeProphix vs DatarailsProphix vs JedoxProphix vs PigmentVena vs Workday Adaptive PlanningVena vs CubeVena vs DatarailsVena vs JedoxVena vs PigmentWorkday Adaptive Planning vs CubeWorkday Adaptive Planning vs DatarailsWorkday Adaptive Planning vs JedoxWorkday Adaptive Planning vs PigmentCube vs DatarailsCube vs JedoxCube vs PigmentDatarails vs JedoxDatarails vs PigmentJedox vs Pigment
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011121314Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Planful22%
Planful22%02Prophix17%
Prophix17%03Vena15%
Vena15%04Workday Adaptive Planning10%
Workday Adaptive Planning10%05Cube8%
Cube8%06Datarails7%
Datarails7%07Jedox2%
Jedox2%08Pigment2%
Pigment2%09SAP Analytics Cloud0%
SAP Analytics Cloud0%10IBM Planning Analytics0%
IBM Planning Analytics0%11OneStream0%
OneStream0%12Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM0%
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM0%13Oracle Hyperion0%
Oracle Hyperion0%14Anaplan0%
Anaplan0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM53%
25 of 47 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“What to Avoid on a Tight Budget | **Oracle / SAP / Anaplan** | Require major (often $100K+) implementation projects” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Anaplan55%
27 of 49 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 10 hard negative
“"you generally want to avoid heavy enterprise platforms like Anaplan or Oracle [which cost tens of thousands annually]"” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Workday Adaptive Planning29%
15 of 52 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“it is recommended to avoid defaulting to Workday Adaptive if cost predictability across thousands of users is a top priority” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
OneStream45%
19 of 42 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“**OneStream** | Enterprise-grade pricing with custom quotes that lean heavily toward larger organizations” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1083 links across 250 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 35 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Drivetrain34 answers · 44 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Cubesoftware26 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
vendor site · PeopleGoal26 answers · 29 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Prophix21 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
21 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
19 answers · 31 citations · 8 models
vendor site · OneStream19 answers · 30 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G218 answers · 24 citations · 7 models
18 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G217 answers · 29 citations · 8 models
17 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
31 answers · 12 models
20 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 11 models
16 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 6 models
13 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best epm software”, “epm platforms”, “epm software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Planful planful.com | 22% | 341 | 3,600 | 685,726 | 58,997 | $137 | 120 | |
| Prophix prophix.com | 17% | 237 | 1,600 | 41 | 14,138 | $109 | 103 | |
| Vena venasolutions.com | 15% | 344 | 12,100 | 3,928 | 62,294 | $13,792 | 58 | |
| Workday workday.com Workday Adaptive Planning 10% | 10% | 407 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | 2,213,450 company | 80 | 5 | |
| Cube cubesoftware.com | 8% | 349 | 90,500 | 152,613 | 168,764 | 13 | 1 | |
| Datarails datarails.com | 7% | 303 | 6,600 | 134 | 18,964 | $16,697 | 107 | 6 |
| Drivetrain drivetrain.ai | 3% | 103 | 18,100 | 2,818 | 8,983 | $134 | 1 | 3 |
| Jedox jedox.com | 2% | 51 | 720 | 3 | 9,363 | $14 | 18 | 9 |
| Pigment pigment.com | 2% | 165 | 49,500 | 25,645 | 12,248 | 22 | 8 | |
| 15Five 15five.com | 2% | 12 | 6,600 | 32 | 32,362 | 22 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cubesoftware.com, drivetrain.ai, onestream.com). The first result for “best epm software” is peoplemanagingpeople.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best EPM software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which corporate performance management platform would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top EPM platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best EPM software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a EPM software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which EPM platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Drivetrainagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAPno first choiceChangedOneStreamDatarails, Venaagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMno first choiceagainst: Datarails, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive Planning
Five alternatives
Jedox, Planful, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningSeven alternatives
Anaplan, Drivetrain, Jedox, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Enterprise Performance Management, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Cube, ProphixGPT-5.4 miniPlanful, VenaWorkday Adaptive PlanningChangedno first choiceVena, Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive Planning
Four alternatives
Board, Jedox, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMTwo alternatives
OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMSix alternatives
Anaplan, IBM Planning Analytics, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive PlanningGemini 3.5 FlashCube, Venaagainst: Workday Adaptive PlanningPigment, VenaChangedno first choiceClockworkagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMno first choiceagainst: Oracle Hyperion, SAPagainst: Anaplan, Cube, Datarails, OneStream, Oracle Hyperion, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP BPC, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Six alternatives
Abacum, Datarails, Mosaic, Pigment, Planful, ProphixThree alternatives
Cube, Mosaic, PlanfulFive alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Fathom, Jirav, LiveFlowSix alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Planful, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningPerplexity SonarPlanfulDatarails, VenaChangedOracle Fusion Cloud EPMProphixagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Datarails, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Four alternatives
Datarails, Drivetrain, Prophix, Workday Adaptive PlanningOne alternative
LatticeSeven alternatives
Anaplan, OneStream, Planful, Prophix, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP Enterprise Performance Management, Workday Adaptive PlanningGrok 4.1 FastPlanful, Prophixagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMDatarailsChangedOracle Fusion Cloud EPMCubeagainst: Anaplan, ERPNext, Google Sheets, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: SAP BPCagainst: Anaplan, Datarails, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Two alternatives
OneStream, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Cube, Planful, Prophix, VenaFour alternatives
Anaplan, OneStream, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Acterys, Konsolidat, VenaSix alternatives
Anaplan, Cube, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Prophix, Workday Adaptive PlanningMistral SmallProfitbase EPM, ProphixProphixChangedAnaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMProphixagainst: Anaplan, OneStreamno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Datarails, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Three alternatives
IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Phocas SoftwareThree alternatives
Centage, Planful, VenaFour alternatives
IBM Planning Analytics, OneStream, Prophix, Workday Adaptive PlanningDeepSeek V4 FlashPlanfulagainst: Workday Adaptive PlanningPlanfulHeldagainst: Anaplan, Betterworks, OneStreamno first choiceCubeagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP, Venano first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMagainst: Excel spreadsheets, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion, Oracle Hyperion Profitability and Cost Management, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP BPC, SAP Profitability and Performance Management
Four alternatives
Drivetrain, Pigment, Prophix, VenaFive alternatives
Board, Lattice, Leapsome, Prophix, Workday Adaptive PlanningEight alternatives
Anaplan, BlackLine, Cube, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Abacum, Jedox, KepionFive alternatives
Jedox, OneStream, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningLlama 4 MaverickPlanfulno first choiceChangedno first choiceProphixno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive Planning
Two alternatives
Prophix, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Anaplan, OneStreamQwen 3.7 FlashPlanfulagainst: Anaplan, OneStreamVena, Workday Adaptive PlanningChangedno first choicePlanfulagainst: IBM Cognos, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion, SAPno first choiceagainst: Anaplanagainst: Anaplan, Fathom, Microsoft Dynamics, OneStream, Oracle Hyperion, Oracle NetSuite, QuickBooks, SAP BusinessObjects, SAP Crystal Reports, Vena, Workday, Xero
Two alternatives
Drivetrain, ProphixThree alternatives
Fathom, NetSuite Planning and Budgeting, PlanfulFour alternatives
Corppass, Datarails, Float, VenaThree alternatives
Corrodevor, Planful, VenaKimi K2Datarails, Drivetrain, Venaagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMPlanful, ProphixChangedagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceCube, Jedoxagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMProphixagainst: Anaplan, IBM Planning Analytics, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPC, Workday Adaptive Planning
Three alternatives
Cube, Planful, ProphixOne alternative
VenaSeven alternatives
Anaplan, BlackLine, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningFive alternatives
15Five, Datarails, PeopleGoal, Planful, VenaFour alternatives
Jedox, Planful, Vena, deFactoGLM 4.7 FlashXCube, Prophixagainst: Anaplan, Board, OneStreamWorkday Adaptive PlanningChangedno first choiceAsana, ClickUpagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Axiom EPM, Betterworks, Epicor Kinetic, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive Planning
One alternative
PlanfulFour alternatives
Anaplan, CCH Tagetik, Prophix, VenaFour alternatives
Celoxis, OnPlan, ProjectManager, SmartsheetMiniMax M2.5Planful, Workday Adaptive PlanningPlanfulChangedagainst: OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP BPCOracle Fusion Cloud EPM15Five, AssessTeamno first choiceagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Three alternatives
Cube, Prophix, VenaThree alternatives
Anaplan, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningFive alternatives
Anaplan, IBM Planning Analytics, Planful, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Excel-Based Solutions, TrakstarGPT-6 LunaPlanfulWorkday Adaptive PlanningChangedno first choiceJiravagainst: Excel or Google Sheets plus your existing accounting softwareno first choiceagainst: Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPC
Three alternatives
NetSuite Planning and Budgeting, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
NetSuite Planning and Budgeting, Planful, VenaOne alternative
CubeSix alternatives
Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningMuse Glimmer 30BPlanful, ProphixVena, Workday Adaptive Planning, now Adaptive InsightsChangedagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Hyperionno first choiceagainst: ProphixKepionagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Planful, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion, Workday Adaptive Planning
Two alternatives
Cube, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Prophix, deFactoThree alternatives
15Five, PeopleGoal, Spotlight ReportingBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:10 | yes | 14 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 1 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:10 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:57 | yes | 24 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:22 | yes | 25 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:11 | yes | 25 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:14 | yes | 18 | 52 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:37 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 9 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:20 | yes | 18 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:44 | yes | 22 | 125 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:13 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:50 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:09 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:56 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:17 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:54 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:33 | yes | 25 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:22 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:58 | yes | 25 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:46 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:20 | no | 0 | 41 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:05 | yes | 25 | 40 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:58 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:54 | yes | 15 | 104 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:53 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:03 | yes | 13 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:42 | yes | 6 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:51 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:57 | yes | 29 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:35 | yes | 22 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:03 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:09 | yes | 18 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:02 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 20 | 31 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:11 | yes | 24 | 137 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:19 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:56 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:27 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:08 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:52 | yes | 26 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:56 | yes | 18 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 22 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:00 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:49 | yes | 23 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:54 | yes | 9 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:00 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:11 | yes | 17 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:29 | yes | 25 | 162 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:16 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:15 | yes | 2 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:59 | yes | 19 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:04 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:44 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:09 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:46 | yes | 16 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:04 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:47 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:20 | yes | 15 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:16 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:32 | yes | 22 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:15 | yes | 22 | 42 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:21 | yes | 9 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:31 | yes | 3 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:40 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:45 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:03 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 23 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:15 | yes | 23 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:43 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:46 | yes | 25 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:34 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:35 | no | 0 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:00 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:04 | yes | 23 | 62 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:58 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:03 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adaptive Insights (Workday) read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Clockwork.ai read as Clockwork
Host Analytics read as Planful
IBM read as IBM Planning Analytics
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
Oracle read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM (Fusion) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Prophix One read as Prophix
SAP BPC read as SAP BPC
SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation) read as SAP BPC
Vena Solutions read as Vena
Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik read as CCH Tagetik
Workday Adaptive read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Unresolved, counted raw
Asana for Enterprise
AssessTeam
Axiom EPM
Cornerstone OnDemand
Corppass
Corrodevor
Excel or Google Sheets plus your existing accounting software
HiBob HRIS
Lattice Performance
Microsoft Project with Project Server/cloud
Oracle Hyperion Profitability and Cost Management (HPCM)
Profitbase EPM
Project Insight (PI)
ProjectManager
Sheetgo
Workday Adaptive Planning, now Adaptive Insights
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.