SaaS metrics and analytics
Asked as “SaaS metrics dashboard”, and as “ARR analytics tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
49%
Clear leader
49ChartMogul14ProfitWell Metrics08Maxio Metrics29others
49% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▲+2Since September 2026: 45% → 48%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.ChartMogul held the lead, +2 points on 45%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
ChartMogul53%Clear leader▲+14Since September 2026: 37% → 51%, +14 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketChartMogul49%Clear leader▲+2Since September 2026: 45% → 48%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterpriseChartMogul25%Contested▲+4Since September 2026: 19% → 22%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
ChartMogul53%Clear leader▲+14Since September 2026: 37% → 51%, +14 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketChartMogul49%Clear leader▲+2Since September 2026: 45% → 48%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterpriseChartMogul25%Contested▲+4Since September 2026: 19% → 22%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01ChartMogul49%12%65endorsed leader▲+2Since September 2026: 45% → 48%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.45% → 48%
ChartMogul49%12%65endorsed leader▲+2Since September 2026: 45% → 48%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.45% → 48%02
ProfitWell Metrics14%29%42criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 17% → 14%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.17% → 14%
ProfitWell Metrics14%29%42criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 17% → 14%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.17% → 14%03
Maxio Metrics8%8%25accepted challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 7%
Maxio Metrics8%8%25accepted challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 7%04
Databox6%0%28accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 10% → 7%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 7%
Databox6%0%28accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 10% → 7%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 7%05
Looker Studio Lab in the set4%12%16accepted challenger▼−10Since September 2026: 14% → 5%, −10 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 5%
Looker Studio Lab in the set4%12%16accepted challenger▼−10Since September 2026: 14% → 5%, −10 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 5%06
Baremetrics2%22%49accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Baremetrics2%22%49accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%07
Amplitude2%30%27criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Amplitude2%30%27criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%08
Looker Lab in the set2%45%11criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Looker Lab in the set2%45%11criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13Google Analytics Lab in the set0%80%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
14
Tableau0%62%16criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Tableau0%62%16criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%11
Heap0%40%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Heap0%40%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%12Microsoft Power BI0%38%13criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
09
Mixpanel0%18%34accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Mixpanel0%18%34accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%10
PostHog0%0%15accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
PostHog0%0%15accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Looker Studio is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models two times of 52. Looker is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models one time of 52. Google Analytics is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
ChartMogul vs Looker StudioChartMogul vs BaremetricsChartMogul vs AmplitudeChartMogul vs LookerProfitWell Metrics vs Maxio MetricsProfitWell Metrics vs DataboxProfitWell Metrics vs Looker StudioProfitWell Metrics vs BaremetricsProfitWell Metrics vs AmplitudeProfitWell Metrics vs LookerMaxio Metrics vs DataboxMaxio Metrics vs Looker StudioMaxio Metrics vs BaremetricsMaxio Metrics vs AmplitudeMaxio Metrics vs LookerDatabox vs Looker StudioDatabox vs BaremetricsDatabox vs AmplitudeDatabox vs LookerLooker Studio vs BaremetricsLooker Studio vs AmplitudeLooker Studio vs LookerBaremetrics vs AmplitudeBaremetrics vs LookerAmplitude vs Looker
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011M12
G13
14Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01ChartMogul49%
ChartMogul49%02ProfitWell Metrics14%
ProfitWell Metrics14%03Maxio Metrics8%
Maxio Metrics8%04Databox6%
Databox6%05Looker Studio4%
Looker Studio4%06Baremetrics2%
Baremetrics2%07Amplitude2%
Amplitude2%08Looker2%
Looker2%09Mixpanel0%
Mixpanel0%10PostHog0%
PostHog0%11Heap0%
Heap0%12Microsoft Power BI0%
13Google Analytics0%
14Tableau0%
Tableau0%What they warned about
Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
ProfitWell Metrics29%
12 of 42 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Bottom line: Avoid if you need real-time data, multi-billing-platform support, or long-term product investment.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Baremetrics22%
11 of 49 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“**Avoid** Baremetrics, basic ChartMogul, basic ProfitWell, and Tableau if you need reliable subscription-revenue metrics.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Tableau62%
10 of 16 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Avoid assuming standard BI tools can handle SaaS metrics natively without significant engineering effort.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Google Analytics
80%
8 of 10 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“"do not use web analytics tools like GA4 as a substitute for product/cohort analytics"” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
79 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1043 links across 272 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 52 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Baremetrics55 answers · 98 citations · 14 models
37 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Databox35 answers · 54 citations · 12 models
23 answers · 80 citations · 11 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G215 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Paddle13 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
12 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
40 answers · 12 models
37 answers · 11 models
22 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 10 models
13 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best saas metrics dashboard”, “saas metrics dashboard”, “saas metrics tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChartMogul chartmogul.com | 49% | 177 | 1,000 | 4 | 4,467 | 2 | ||
| ProfitWell paddle.com ProfitWell Metrics 14%, Paddle Retain 0% | 14% | 109 | 10 | 0 | 172,079 | 31 | ||
| Maxio Metrics maxio.com | 8% | 61 | 0 | 32,891 | $518 | 59 | 6 | |
| Databox databox.com | 6% | 99 | 3,600 | 68 | 60,861 | 4 | ||
| Looker Studio lookerstudio.google.com | 4% | 75 | 40,500 | 452 | 5,456 | |||
| Baremetrics baremetrics.com | 2% | 152 | 590 | 3 | 42,517 | 26 | 6 | |
| Amplitude amplitude.com | 2% | 80 | 74,000 | 5,691 | 373,273 | $207 | 27 | |
| Toolboks | 2% | |||||||
| Fairview getfairview.com | 2% | 5 | 90,500 | 10,961 | 9 | |||
| Ploxir ploxir.com | 2% | 3 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (baremetrics.com). The first result for “best saas metrics dashboard” is uxcam.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best SaaS metrics dashboard for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which ARR analytics tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top SaaS metrics tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best SaaS metrics dashboard for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a SaaS metrics dashboard. What should we look at?”Negative“Which SaaS metrics tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5AmplitudeChartMogulChangedChartMogulProfitWell Metricsno first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Google Analytics, Heap, Looker, Mixpanel, Pendo, Sigma Computing, Tableau
Three alternatives
Databox, HubSpot Operations Hub, MixpanelThree alternatives
HubSpot, Maxio Metrics, MixpanelFive alternatives
Amplitude, Baremetrics, Databox, Mixpanel, ProfitWell MetricsFour alternatives
Geckoboard, Looker Studio, Metabase, Taskade GenesisGPT-5.4 miniLookerChartMogulChangedAmplitude, Mixpanelagainst: ProfitWell MetricsChartMogulno first choiceagainst: Paddle
Three alternatives
Domo, June, MixpanelThree alternatives
Maxio Metrics, Paddle, ProfitWell MetricsFive alternatives
Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Heap, Pendo, PostHogThree alternatives
Apache Superset, Looker Studio, PlausibleGemini 3.5 FlashMaxio Metrics, Subscriptagainst: Baremetrics, Looker, ProfitWell Metrics, TableauChartMogulChangedagainst: StripeChartMogul, ProfitWell MetricsChartMogulno first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Google Analytics, Maxio Metrics, Metabase, Mixpanel, ProfitWell / Paddle Retain, Stripe, Tableau
Four alternatives
Amplitude, ChartMogul, Mixpanel, MosaicEight alternatives
BigQuery, Dreamdata, Fivetran, HockeyStack, Maxio Metrics, Microsoft Power BI, Snowflake, dbtSix alternatives
Amplitude, Baremetrics, Databox, Maxio Metrics, Mixpanel, PostHogSix alternatives
Databox, Google Sheets, Looker Studio, Mixpanel, PostHog, ProfitWell MetricsPerplexity SonarChartMogulChartMogulHeldBaremetrics, ChartMogulagainst: Google AnalyticsProfitWell Metricsno first choiceagainst: Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Whatagraph
Three alternatives
Amplitude, Databox, Maxio MetricsOne alternative
Maxio MetricsSeven alternatives
Amplitude, Databox, Heap, Microsoft Power BI, Mixpanel, PostHog, ProfitWell MetricsFour alternatives
Amplitude, ChartMogul, Microsoft Power BI, MixpanelGrok 4.1 FastChartMogulagainst: SnowflakeChartMogulHeldBaremetrics, Mixpanelagainst: Google Analytics, ProfitWell MetricsDatabox, Looker Studiono first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Heap, ProfitWell Metrics
Five alternatives
Amplitude, Baremetrics, Databox, Looker Studio, MixpanelTwo alternatives
Baremetrics, Maxio MetricsThree alternatives
Amplitude, ChartMogul, DataboxOne alternative
ChartMogulMistral SmallChartMogul, DataboxARRGuide, ToolboksChangedno first choicePloxirno first choiceagainst: Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BIagainst: Amplitude, Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Domo, Google Analytics, Looker, Mixpanel, ProfitWell Metrics, Qlik, Tableau
Two alternatives
Tableau, ToolboksTwo alternatives
Dreamdata, People.aiThree alternatives
Mixpanel, ProfitWell Metrics, SaaSGridDeepSeek V4 FlashChartMogulMaxio MetricsChangedagainst: ProfitWell Metricsno first choiceChartMogul, ProfitWell Metricsno first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Capterra, G2, Heap, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, Mixpanel, ProfitWell Metrics, Tableau
Four alternatives
Amplitude, Baremetrics, Mixpanel, ProfitWell MetricsTwo alternatives
Baremetrics, ChartMogulEight alternatives
Amplitude, Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Maxio Metrics, Mixpanel, PostHog, ProfitWell Metrics, RevenueCatFour alternatives
Baremetrics, Databox, Looker Studio, MetabaseLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceProfitWell Metricsno first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Google Analytics, Mixpanel, ProfitWell Metrics, Tableau
Three alternatives
Baremetrics, Databox, Looker StudioQwen 3.7 FlashChartMogulMaxio MetricsChangedBaremetrics, ProfitWell MetricsLooker Studioagainst: Baremetricsno first choiceagainst: Looker, Microsoft Power BI, Tableauagainst: Baremetrics, Microsoft Power BI, ProfitWell Metrics, Tableau
Two alternatives
Baremetrics, DataboxTwo alternatives
People.ai, ToolboksFive alternatives
Amplitude, ChartMogul, Databox, Mixpanel, PostHogThree alternatives
ChartMogul, Mixpanel, ProfitWell MetricsFive alternatives
Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Databox, Klipfolio, SublevelKimi K2ChartMogulChartMogulHeldAmplitude, ChartMogulChartMogulno first choiceagainst: Baremetrics, ChartMogul
Four alternatives
Baremetrics, Databox, Klipfolio, Paddle RetainThree alternatives
Baremetrics, Maxio Metrics, Paddle RetainFive alternatives
Baremetrics, Heap, Mixpanel, PostHog, ProfitWell MetricsFour alternatives
Databox, Geckoboard, Metabase, ProfitWell MetricsGLM 4.7 FlashXDataboxagainst: Microsoft Power BIChartMogulChangedagainst: BaremetricsChartMogulProfitWell Metricsno first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Google Analytics, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, ProfitWell Metrics, Tableau
Four alternatives
Amplitude, Baremetrics, ChartMogul, GainsightTwo alternatives
Maxio Metrics, YouniumSix alternatives
Amplitude, Baremetrics, Databox, Heap, Mixpanel, ProfitWell MetricsFour alternatives
ChartMogul, Databox, Looker Studio, PostHogMiniMax M2.5ChartMogulChartMogulHeldBaremetrics, ChartMogulProfitWell MetricsBaremetrics, ChartMogul, Fairviewagainst: Lookeragainst: Baremetrics, ChartMogul, ProfitWell Metrics, Tableau
Six alternatives
Baremetrics, Databox, Maxio Metrics, Microsoft Power BI, ProfitWell Metrics, TableauTwo alternatives
Baremetrics, Maxio MetricsThree alternatives
Google Analytics, Mixpanel, ProfitWell MetricsFive alternatives
Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Databox, Looker Studio, PostHogGPT-6 LunaChartMogulMaxio MetricsChangedChartMogulChartMogul, Stripeno first choiceagainst: Amplitude, ChartMogul, Maxio Metrics, Paddle, ProfitWell Metrics
One alternative
Maxio MetricsOne alternative
ChartMogulThree alternatives
Amplitude, Baremetrics, ProfitWell MetricsMuse Glimmer 30BChartMogulChartMogulHeldBaremetrics, ChartMogulProfitWell Metricsno first choiceagainst: Google Analytics
Three alternatives
Baremetrics, Paddle, ProfitWell MetricsThree alternatives
Baremetrics, Maxio Metrics, TekStackFour alternatives
Amplitude, Databox, Mixpanel, ProfitWell, now part of PaddleThree alternatives
Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Looker StudioBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:27 | yes | 17 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:21 | yes | 22 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:39 | yes | 23 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:15 | yes | 13 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:39 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:22 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:58 | yes | 13 | 40 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:07 | yes | 19 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:33 | yes | 19 | 159 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:28 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:19 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:00 | yes | 21 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:01 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:52 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:28 | yes | 21 | 39 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 25 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:37 | yes | 17 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:33 | yes | 12 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:23 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:21 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:29 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:23 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 14 | 58 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:22 | yes | 13 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:49 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:19 | yes | 14 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:39 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 6 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:37 | yes | 6 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:21 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:22 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:17 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 24 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:33 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:35 | yes | 7 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:02 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:07 | yes | 22 | 39 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:25 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:25 | yes | 4 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:28 | yes | 14 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:38 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:28 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 11 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:14 | yes | 21 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:35 | yes | 13 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:42 | yes | 24 | 45 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:35 | no | 0 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:14 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:24 | yes | 18 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:02 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:38 | yes | 11 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:25 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:43 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:49 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:54 | yes | 15 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 12 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:06 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:24 | yes | 19 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:41 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:36 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:42 | yes | 9 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 20 | 85 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:18 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:51 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:48 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:51 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:41 | yes | 3 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:35 | yes | 18 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:29 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:42 | yes | 25 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:42 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:44 | yes | 23 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:49 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 15 | 44 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:52 | yes | 23 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:51 | yes | 24 | 69 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:51 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:19 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
Noise floor in this category
Flips between the edition run and its calibration repeat. Six prompts per model is a small sample; the index-wide floor is the number to trust.
ShowHide
Claude Haiku 4.5
1 of 4 flipped
GPT-5.4 mini
2 of 4 flipped
Gemini 3.5 Flash
3 of 5 flipped
Perplexity Sonar
1 of 4 flipped
Grok 4.1 Fast
2 of 4 flipped
Mistral Small
3 of 3 flipped
DeepSeek V4 Flash
5 of 6 flipped
Llama 4 Maverick
1 of 2 flipped
Qwen 3.7 Flash
5 of 5 flipped
Kimi K2
3 of 5 flipped
GLM 4.7 FlashX
3 of 4 flipped
MiniMax M2.5
4 of 5 flipped
GPT-6 Luna
5 of 5 flipped
Muse Glimmer 30B
3 of 4 flipped
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Google Looker Studio read as Looker Studio
Maxio read as Maxio Metrics
Maxio (SaaSOptics + Chargify) read as Maxio Metrics
Maxio (formerly Chargify + SaaSOptics) read as Maxio Metrics
Maxio (formerly SaaSOptics) read as Maxio Metrics
PowerBI read as Microsoft Power BI
ProfitWell read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell (Paddle Metrics) read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell (Paddle) read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell (by Paddle) read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell (now Paddle Metrics) read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell (now Paddle Retain) read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell by Paddle read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell/Paddle read as ProfitWell Metrics
Profitwell (now Paddle Metrics) read as ProfitWell Metrics
SaaSOptics read as Maxio Metrics
Sigma read as Sigma Computing
Unresolved, counted raw
Aviso
Capterra
CentSight
Cloudflare Web Analytics
Cozomo
June
Key Metrics
Matomo
Power My Analytics
ProfitWell, now part of Paddle
Simple Analytics
Sublevel
Tableau Cloud
Turboboost
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.