SaaS metrics and analytics for small business buyers
Asked as “SaaS metrics dashboard”, and as “ARR analytics tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
53%
Clear leader
53ChartMogul26ProfitWell Metrics13Baremetrics08others
53% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▲+14Since September 2026: 37% → 51%, +14 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.ChartMogul held the lead, +14 points on 37%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
ChartMogul53%Clear leader▲+14Since September 2026: 37% → 51%, +14 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketChartMogul49%Clear leader▲+2Since September 2026: 45% → 48%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseChartMogul25%Contested▲+4Since September 2026: 19% → 22%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
ChartMogul53%Clear leader▲+14Since September 2026: 37% → 51%, +14 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketChartMogul49%Clear leader▲+2Since September 2026: 45% → 48%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseChartMogul25%Contested▲+4Since September 2026: 19% → 22%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01ChartMogul53%7%69endorsed leader▲+14Since September 2026: 37% → 51%, +14 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.37% → 51%
ChartMogul53%7%69endorsed leader▲+14Since September 2026: 37% → 51%, +14 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.37% → 51%02
ProfitWell Metrics26%6%51accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 29% → 26%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.29% → 26%
ProfitWell Metrics26%6%51accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 29% → 26%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.29% → 26%03
Baremetrics13%17%66accepted challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 8% → 15%, +7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 15%
Baremetrics13%17%66accepted challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 8% → 15%, +7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 15%04
Databox2%6%35accepted challenger▼−12Since September 2026: 14% → 2%, −12 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 2%
Databox2%6%35accepted challenger▼−12Since September 2026: 14% → 2%, −12 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 2%05
Looker Studio Lab in the set2%15%20accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 8% → 2%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 2%
Looker Studio Lab in the set2%15%20accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 8% → 2%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 2%Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12
Tableau0%100%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Tableau0%100%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11
Heap0%67%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Heap0%67%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%10
Amplitude0%52%27criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Amplitude0%52%27criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%09Microsoft Power BI0%50%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
06
Mixpanel0%17%42accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Mixpanel0%17%42accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%07
PostHog0%5%20accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
PostHog0%5%20accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%08
Metabase0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Metabase0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Looker Studio is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models one time of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
ChartMogul vs Looker StudioChartMogul vs BaremetricsChartMogul vs AmplitudeChartMogul vs LookerProfitWell Metrics vs Maxio MetricsProfitWell Metrics vs DataboxProfitWell Metrics vs Looker StudioProfitWell Metrics vs BaremetricsProfitWell Metrics vs AmplitudeProfitWell Metrics vs LookerMaxio Metrics vs DataboxMaxio Metrics vs Looker StudioMaxio Metrics vs BaremetricsMaxio Metrics vs AmplitudeMaxio Metrics vs LookerDatabox vs Looker StudioDatabox vs BaremetricsDatabox vs AmplitudeDatabox vs LookerLooker Studio vs BaremetricsLooker Studio vs AmplitudeLooker Studio vs LookerBaremetrics vs AmplitudeBaremetrics vs LookerAmplitude vs Looker
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708M09
101112Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01ChartMogul53%
ChartMogul53%02ProfitWell Metrics26%
ProfitWell Metrics26%03Baremetrics13%
Baremetrics13%04Databox2%
Databox2%05Looker Studio2%
Looker Studio2%06Mixpanel0%
Mixpanel0%07PostHog0%
PostHog0%08Metabase0%
Metabase0%09Microsoft Power BI0%
10Amplitude0%
Amplitude0%11Heap0%
Heap0%12Tableau0%
Tableau0%What they warned about
Seven of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Amplitude52%
14 of 27 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Built for enterprise teams; overkill for early-stage companies” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Tableau100%
11 of 11 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“These are generally overkill for small businesses due to high costs, complexity, and the need for specialized skills.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Baremetrics17%
11 of 66 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Tools to Approach with Caution ... Baremetrics - Red flag: Pricing starts at ~$75/month with no true free plan” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Heap67%
8 of 12 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Heap (Free Tier) \u2014 Be Wary ... Pricing is not transparent ... Autocapture creates data bloat” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 937 links across 246 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 52 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Baremetrics60 answers · 100 citations · 14 models
vendor site · Databox43 answers · 60 citations · 13 models
43 answers · 43 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Younium20 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
17 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · ChartMogul17 answers · 20 citations · 7 models
17 answers · 18 citations · 11 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
15 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Taskade13 answers · 13 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Paddle12 answers · 15 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
43 answers · 11 models
40 answers · 12 models
29 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 11 models
17 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 7 models
15 answers · 11 models
14 answers · 6 models
13 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best saas metrics dashboard”, “saas metrics dashboard”, “saas metrics tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChartMogul chartmogul.com | 53% | 177 | 1,000 | 4 | 4,467 | 2 | ||
| ProfitWell paddle.com ProfitWell Metrics 26%, Paddle Retain 2%, Paddle 0% | 28% | 206 | 60,500 | 69,116 | 172,079 | 31 | ||
| Baremetrics baremetrics.com | 13% | 152 | 590 | 3 | 42,517 | 26 | 6 | |
| Databox databox.com | 2% | 99 | 3,600 | 68 | 60,861 | 4 | ||
| Looker Studio lookerstudio.google.com | 2% | 75 | 40,500 | 452 | 5,456 | |||
| TrueARR true-arr.com | 2% | 1 | ||||||
| Mixpanel mixpanel.com | 0% | 97 | 12,100 | 458 | 20,284 | $458 | 11 | |
| PostHog posthog.com | 0% | 45 | 33,100 | 271 | 25,936 | 120 | ||
| Metabase metabase.com | 0% | 37 | 14,800 | 337 | 60,151 | 1 | ||
| Geckoboard geckoboard.com | 0% | 14 | 880 | 15 | 45,450 | 5 | 7 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (baremetrics.com). The first result for “best saas metrics dashboard” is uxcam.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best SaaS metrics dashboard for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which ARR analytics tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top SaaS metrics tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best SaaS metrics dashboard for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a SaaS metrics dashboard. What should we look at?”Negative“Which SaaS metrics tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5ChartMogulChartMogul, ProfitWell MetricsChangedMetabaseChartMogul, ProfitWell Metricsno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Baremetrics, Looker Studio, ProfitWell MetricsThree alternatives
Baremetrics, June.so, YouniumEight alternatives
Amplitude, Baremetrics, Basedash, ChartMogul, Hex, Mixpanel, Omni, Sigma ComputingThree alternatives
Baremetrics, Looker Studio, MetabaseGPT-5.4 miniChartMogulagainst: Amplitude, MixpanelChartMogulHeldBaremetrics, ChartMogulProfitWell Metricsno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Baremetrics, ProfitWell MetricsTwo alternatives
Baremetrics, Maxio MetricsFive alternatives
Amplitude, Mixpanel, Paddle, PostHog, ProfitWell MetricsOne alternative
ChartMogulGemini 3.5 FlashChartMogulChartMogulHeldProfitWell Metricsagainst: AmplitudeChartMogul, ProfitWell Metricsagainst: Amplitude, Google Sheets, Looker Studio, MixpanelBaremetrics, ChartMogulagainst: Amplitude, Chargebee, Heap, Looker Studio, Maxio Metrics, Microsoft Power BI, Mixpanel, Paddle Retain, Recurly, Stripe Billing, Stripe Sigma, Tableau
Seven alternatives
Amplitude, Baremetrics, Databox, Metabase, Mixpanel, PostHog, ProfitWell MetricsThree alternatives
Baremetrics, Chartsy, ProfitWell MetricsFour alternatives
Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Mixpanel, PostHogFour alternatives
Databox, Google Analytics, June.so, PostHogOne alternative
ProfitWell MetricsPerplexity SonarBaremetricsagainst: Maxio MetricsBaremetrics, ChartMogulChangedBaremetrics, ProfitWell MetricsChartMogulno first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Google Analytics, Heap, Microsoft Power BI, Tableau, Whatagraph
Two alternatives
ChartMogul, MixpanelThree alternatives
Maxio Metrics, Younium, m3terSix alternatives
Databox, Klipfolio, Metabase, Mixpanel, PostHog, Stripe SigmaTwo alternatives
Mixpanel, ProfitWell MetricsGrok 4.1 FastChartMogulChartMogulHeldProfitWell Metrics, StripeReportPaddle Retainagainst: Baremetricsno first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Datadog, Domo, Heap, Looker, Maxio Metrics, Qlik, Tableau
Five alternatives
Baremetrics, Databox, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, ProfitWell MetricsOne alternative
BaremetricsTwo alternatives
Baremetrics, ChartMogulFour alternatives
ChartMogul, Databox, Looker Studio, MixpanelMistral SmallBaremetricsChartMogulChangedBaremetrics, ChartMogulagainst: DataboxProfitWell Metricsno first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Baremetrics, Domo, Heap, Looker, Qlik, Sisense, Tableau
Two alternatives
Databox, MixpanelOne alternative
ProfitWell MetricsThree alternatives
ChartMogul, Databox, Looker StudioDeepSeek V4 FlashChartMogulChartMogulHeldagainst: Chargebee, ProfitWell MetricsChartMogulProfitWell MetricsChartMogul, ProfitWell Metricsagainst: Amplitude, Apache Superset, Baremetrics, Domo, Heap, Looker, Qlik, Tableau, dbt
Four alternatives
Baremetrics, Databox, Mixpanel, ProfitWell MetricsOne alternative
BaremetricsSix alternatives
Amplitude, Baremetrics, Databox, Mixpanel, PostHog, ProfitWell MetricsFour alternatives
Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Databox, Looker StudioThree alternatives
Baremetrics, Databox, MixpanelLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceBaremetrics, ChartMogul, TrueARRChangedno first choiceProfitWell Metricsno first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Baremetrics, Looker, Tableau
Three alternatives
Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Looker StudioQwen 3.7 FlashChartMogulChartMogulHeldagainst: ProfitWell MetricsAmplitude, Baremetrics, Mixpanelagainst: PendoBaremetricsno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Power BI, Tableauagainst: Amplitude, Baremetrics, Chargebee, ChartMogul, Domo, Heap, Looker, Mixpanel, ProfitWell Metrics, QlikSense, Tableau, Zuora
Three alternatives
Looker Studio, Supermetrics, VitallyThree alternatives
Dryrun, Looker Studio, SupermetricsFour alternatives
ChartMogul, Google Analytics, PostHog, ProfitWell MetricsThree alternatives
ChartMogul, Kodo, Looker StudioKimi K2ProfitWell MetricsChartMogulChangedProfitWell MetricsProfitWell Metricsno first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Baremetrics, FullStory, Maxio Metrics, Mixpanel
Two alternatives
Baremetrics, ChartMogulTwo alternatives
Baremetrics, ProfitWell MetricsFour alternatives
Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Databox, MixpanelFour alternatives
ChartMogul, Databox, Google Sheets, MixpanelGLM 4.7 FlashXChartMogul, DataboxChartMogulChangedBaremetrics, ChartMogulLooker Studio, ProfitWell Metricsno first choiceagainst: ChartMogul, Facebook Business Tools, Google Analytics, HubSpot
Four alternatives
Baremetrics, Microsoft Power BI, Mixpanel, ProfitWell MetricsTwo alternatives
Baremetrics, ProfitWell MetricsThree alternatives
Databox, Mixpanel, ProfitWell MetricsFive alternatives
AgencyAnalytics, ChartMogul, Databox, Metabase, MixpanelMiniMax M2.5Baremetricsagainst: Gainsight, Looker, Maxio Metrics, TableauChartMogulChangedBaremetrics, MixpanelProfitWell Metricsno first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Baremetrics, Databox, Domo, Google Analytics, Heap, Looker, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, Mixpanel, Qlik, Tableau
Four alternatives
ChartMogul, Metabase, ProfitWell Metrics, TotangoTwo alternatives
Baremetrics, ProfitWell MetricsThree alternatives
ChartMogul, Databox, PostHogFive alternatives
Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Databox, Mixpanel, PostHogGPT-6 LunaChartMogulChartMogulHeldChartMogul, Mixpanel, PostHogagainst: AmplitudeProfitWell Metricsno first choiceagainst: Baremetrics, ChartMogul
Two alternatives
Baremetrics, DataboxOne alternative
BaremetricsTwo alternatives
Baremetrics, Stripe Billing's built-in analyticsTwo alternatives
ChartMogul, Stripe BillingMuse Glimmer 30BChartMogulChartMogulHeldProfitWell / Paddle RetainProfitWell Metricsagainst: Baremetricsno first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Google Analytics, Heap, Microsoft Power BI, Mixpanel, PostHog, Salesforce Analytics, Tableau
Two alternatives
Baremetrics, ProfitWell MetricsTwo alternatives
Baremetrics, Stripe AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Baremetrics, ChartMogulFour alternatives
ChartMogul, Databox, Looker Studio, Taskade GenesisBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:35 | yes | 9 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:55 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:15 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:03 | yes | 38 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:12 | yes | 23 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:47 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 19 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:14 | no | 0 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:02 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:31 | no | 0 | 45 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:18 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:58 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 18 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:12 | yes | 23 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:55 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:54 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:49 | yes | 22 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:16 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:00 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:52 | yes | 11 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:56 | yes | 13 | 68 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:12 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:12 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:10 | yes | 13 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:40 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:25 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:36 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:04 | yes | 19 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:42 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:10 | yes | 23 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:06 | yes | 15 | 40 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:10 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:31 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 15 | 32 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:39 | yes | 6 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:46 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:11 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:36 | yes | 16 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:38 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:54 | yes | 19 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:22 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:41 | yes | 17 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:55 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:41 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 18 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:16 | yes | 20 | 48 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 8 | 49 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:39 | yes | 3 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:16 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:13 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:17 | yes | 12 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:31 | yes | 15 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:04 | yes | 13 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:20 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:16 | yes | 15 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:10 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:45 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:50 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:37 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:48 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:53 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:28 | yes | 11 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:52 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:02 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 13 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:37 | yes | 18 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:45 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:50 | yes | 25 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:09 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:14 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:30 | yes | 23 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:27 | yes | 14 | 75 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:15 | yes | 8 | 65 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 3 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:02 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Google Looker Studio read as Looker Studio
Google Looker Studio (formerly Data Studio) read as Looker Studio
Maxio read as Maxio Metrics
Maxio (formerly SaaSOptics) read as Maxio Metrics
Paddle's ProfitWell Metrics read as Paddle Retain
PowerBI read as Microsoft Power BI
ProfitWell read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell (Paddle Metrics) read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell (by Paddle) read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell (now Paddle Metrics) read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell (now Paddle Retain) read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell (now Paddle) read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell / Paddle Metrics read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell/Paddle read as ProfitWell Metrics
SaaSOptics read as Maxio Metrics
Sigma read as Sigma Computing
Taskade read as Taskade Genesis
Taskade (Genesis) read as Taskade Genesis
Unresolved, counted raw
Baremetrics Recover
Churn Buster
Churnkey
Churnly
Cumul.io
Facebook Business Tools
GA4 with Looker Studio
Keen IO
Kodo
Measure
Omni
QlikSense
Radar
Revova
Salesforce Analytics
Stripe Billing's built-in analytics
Stripe Dashboard
Stripe's built-in analytics
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.