Four categories · what the models named insteadAlternatives to Workday Adaptive Planning, as AI models named them
In the September 2026 Edition, 706 of the 864 answers collected in the four categories where Workday Adaptive Planning holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.
Corporate performance management
Fifty-eight of the seventy-two answers did not name Workday Adaptive Planning; it was the first choice in seven. The first choices in those fifty-eight answers, twenty-three products in all, the eight most named:
Fifty-three of the seventy-two answers did not name Workday Adaptive Planning; it was the first choice in five. The first choices in those fifty-three answers, fifteen products in all, the eight most named:
Forty-five of the seventy-two answers did not name Workday Adaptive Planning; it was the first choice in three. The first choices in those forty-five answers, ten products in all, the eight most named:
Financial modeling and scenario planning
Seventy-two of the seventy-two answers did not name Workday Adaptive Planning; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those seventy-two answers, twenty-two products in all, the eight most named:
Sixty-six of the seventy-two answers did not name Workday Adaptive Planning; it was the first choice in two. The first choices in those sixty-six answers, sixteen products in all, the eight most named:
Fifty-two of the seventy-two answers did not name Workday Adaptive Planning; it was the first choice in one. The first choices in those fifty-two answers, eleven products in all, the eight most named:
FP&A platforms
Seventy-two of the seventy-two answers did not name Workday Adaptive Planning; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those seventy-two answers, thirteen products in all, the eight most named:
Fifty-six of the seventy-two answers did not name Workday Adaptive Planning; it was the first choice in two. The first choices in those fifty-six answers, fourteen products in all, the eight most named:
Thirty of the seventy-two answers did not name Workday Adaptive Planning; it was the first choice in eight. The first choices in those thirty answers, five products in all:
The full enterprise standing →
Cash flow forecasting
Seventy-two of the seventy-two answers did not name Workday Adaptive Planning; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those seventy-two answers, nineteen products in all, the eight most named:
Sixty-nine of the seventy-two answers did not name Workday Adaptive Planning; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those sixty-nine answers, twenty-three products in all, the eight most named:
Sixty-one of the seventy-two answers did not name Workday Adaptive Planning; it was the first choice in two. The first choices in those sixty-one answers, eleven products in all, the eight most named:
How to read this
A category is asked six ways of each of twelve models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is seventy-two answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled Workday Adaptive Planning neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named Workday Adaptive Planning only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from Workday Adaptive Planning's side.
Every answer and every label is in the free record. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of Workday Adaptive Planning was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.